Message from @Brohacho Muchacho
Discord ID: 510674352195502081
if you resort to violence you break the law and make everything worse
this is always how things escalate, people take into their own hands what they absolutely should not
Look at what happens during natural disasters and terrorist attacks before the government gets organized and comes in to help. The PEOPLE move in and start helping first.
And when the government consistently fails to live up to our expectations? The PEOPLE step up and help even more.
So why is this any different? The government is failing us, it's our time to step up and act.
The American Revolution would never have got going with that logic, Brohacho Muchacho.
@JustTom groups like antifa are essentially well funded international terrorists that form a global army of sorts, that does seem like a military required response
@Misomania I agree. but the military isn't responding. So how do you suggest we deal with it?
Because Just Tom, if the wrong move is made
the american revolution was a very unique scenario, it is very different than the antifa situation in america
WE are framed as the bad guys
and WE are made the enemies of their allies
you win over their allies however
and they lose a lot of their power
Nah. Kill them all and we'll be fine. History is written by the victors.
Then we become no worse
than what they say
bottom line: we absolutely CANNOT take violent action against antifa ourselves unless it is in provable self defense
No, violent action might be necessary IF it gets to the point of no return
but not before
that would be provable self defense
Honestly? I don't care what they say, because they've already called me a nazi racist facist anti-woman, mysogynist alt-right ... god I can't even remember half the shit they've called me.
So, why should I care if they add a few more names to that list, if in the end, I stop their violence and terrorism?
Im not saying add more named
Im saying we become what they preach if we go and
"kill em all"
Not all of that ofc
but some of it
and some of it is just enough to twist more centrist views against those who are actually against it
"So, why should I care if they add a few more names to that list, if in the end, I stop their violence and terrorism?" wha... WHAT? do you even HEAR yourself right now? the ends do not justify the means. this is the path that anifa took
I never said kill them all outside of the joking reference to history is written by the winners.
My serious stance, from the beginning, has been that every time they riot and commit terrorist acts, that's when we need to show up and shoot everyone involved as terrorists.
look, i understand what you are saying and actually i do agree to some extent
It should also be said, Antifa acts like we're at war. We're not. There are political disagreements. If you have to defend yourself, do it. But it isn't a war, and if we're rational and calm we're the ones in the right.
BUT
^ what G said
well yeah what he said
the war though is globalists vs national existence
If I'm driving down the street and an antifa group is blocking off traffic and threatening people while smashing and kicking their cars: That's a terrorist act, and they all need to be shot.
"That's a terrorist act, and they all need to be shot." im sorry i didnt realize you run the law
Moral stance. I support protecting innocent people.
like the EU pact for migration that wants to relocate something like 250 million people to canada, EU and the USA from africa and middle east
i do as well, but i also support not killing people
We just had an interesting convo on Sexonomics.