Message from @Undead Mockingbird
Discord ID: 516254282522165248
You are consenting to sex with a condom
A man should not be held to the same responsibility in both cases.
I thought we agreed on that.
not sex with a bad condom
What?
Hmm. It's a good question, Mockingbird. I'm not sure, I'll have to think on it.
Sorry, I lost track.
I have to re-read what quesiton you mean.
Ok, look its like this. In cases where SHE pokes a hole in the condom, you are consenting to SEX ONLY WITH A FUNCTIONAL condom
That is what you consented too
You did not consent to have a useless piece of junk on your dick
The question is about whether a man should be accountable for being a father then.
not in that case, since its given on a false premise
And in that case, there was FOUL PLAY
so no
Good.
but ignore FOUL PLAY
I am relieved.
we are not talking about it
the premise was that it wasn't tampered with
If holes were poked, theres tampering and as such the man should not be responsible since he was lied to
So far, consent only seems to matter in the case of a woman. If a man fathers a child, as it is now, he is responsible financially.
And reality aint fair
So, then, if consent to one act of sex can be extended indefinatly into consent to something completly different, do you think rape should be a crime that is possible to commit in marriages or did you consent to sex by being married? @Cody
Not only that, he is doubly responsible in that he finances abortions.
That is not what marriage means
and if not him, then the state (and thus taxpayer) is responsible for that financing 😦
which is abhorent, since the taxpayers have nothing to do with ti
Yes, reality is not fair. But that is literally what we are talking about:
What would be fair?
If you consented to sex, and there WAS *NO* FOUL PLAY
strap the rape-e down and put the vacuum on her yahoo for purging of the falseley obtained fetus
then you are responsible too
so what is the question? the premise of consent of both parties having sex or the premise of consent to unprotected sex thus creating a child?
@Cody well, i would think it does. Since you seem to play the part of the traditionalist here
You keep saying if you consented to sex, but what if you didn't consent to being a father?
But consenting to SEX is CONSENTING to the CHANCE OF A BABY
This is like nailing jello to the wall.
Doesn't matter how much you try and prevent it