It is not rare

You dont listen

@Rouqen

I mean, by percentages it's pretty uncommon.

I think the global gold supply currently available makes a 50 foot cube.

But please don't do that, a lot of people would get upset.

Objects change properties dependent on when they're measured, basically

I would want to see that @Bookworm

Add enough speed to shit and the measurements change

will look pretty

Just like how you get time dilation

@Rouqen What do you not understand though

it was pretty stable currency for a milenia if we dont count spanish gold rush

You never refuted any of my points

Didnt know this was a debate

Also

Don't your points support me

No

About societal value

The only objective value is energy imo

It proves it is objective in the context of societal value

lmao

Societal is not objective

Lol thats funny

shit

doesn't work

wait

Why delete that?

@Rouqen Oh god

> me

Holy shit, I didn't know Notch was so based

I thought that tweet was fake at first

Notch is based

Notch sits on top of his pile of Fuck You money and BTFOs people

Fuck you money loo

A true capitalist

Notch is what happens when a normal person doesn't have to lie.

Isnt that trump

Notch is a legend

It is in regard to a free market that the distinction between an intrinsic, subjective, and objective view of values is particularly important to understand. The market value of a product is not an intrinsic value, not a “value in itself” hanging in a vacuum. A free market never loses sight of the question: Of value to whom? And, within the broad field of objectivity, the market value of a product does not reflect its philosophically objective value, but only its socially objective value.

By “philosophically objective,” I mean a value estimated from the standpoint of the best possible to man, i.e., by the criterion of the most rational mind possessing the greatest knowledge, in a given category, in a given period, and in a defined context (nothing can be estimated in an undefined context). For instance, it can be rationally proved that the airplane is objectively of immeasurably greater value to man (to man at his best) than the bicycle—and that the works of Victor Hugo are objectivelyof immeasurably greater value than true-confession magazines. But if a given man’s intellectual potential can barely manage to enjoy true confessions, there is no reason why his meager earnings, the product of his effort, should be spent on books he cannot read—or on subsidizing the airplane industry, if his own transportation needs do not extend beyond the range of a bicycle. (Nor is there any reason why the rest of mankind should be held down to the level of his literary taste, his engineering capacity, and his income. Values are not determined by fiat nor by majority vote.)