Message from @Bayesed
Discord ID: 520064806309330974
you may wage your meme jihad... but you will not win. t-series will overtake the number one youtube spot
MR BEAST WHERE ARE YOU
Meme crusade. It's defensive.
@Salacious Swanky Cat I don't have to prove he didn't. You have to prove he did
It's not post hoc, it's statistics
So the only mentally healthy people are Christians and Christians are never not mentally unhealthy?
Is God not something? The statement was
>something can't come from nothing
SUBSCRIBE TO PEWDIEPIE
T GAY DIE
man
If I roll the dice, the chance of getting a 6 before is one in 6, afterwards it's 1 in 1
y can't something come from nothing? Isn't nothing something?
^^ good user name
The chances of a thing cease to matter after it's happened, unless you're trying to replicate it
What are the odds that life would exist the way it currently does? 100% lol. Of course it exists the way we see it
It also operates on the basis that everything was entirely random, which, ???
Nobody made that claim
Sub 👏 Scribe 👏
so racist.
hating on indians.
native fucking americans!
what did they ever do to you huh?
@Beemann Why would it not be the case? We, as you stated, evolved to have religious beliefs.
Your point on probability is post hoc. The chances to get to where we are are phenomenal. Write a model to predict that. Lol
what makes you think 2+2=4?
Because religious beliefs can be beneficial and not true? Again, we're tribal as a species, and seek answers. We used to have shitty predictive models
thas the definition of our mathematical structure
@Bayesed nice strawman. Lol
We thought the earth was a fucking disc
oh, semantics, i see.
@Beemann so?
yes
everything is semantics
So we believed a lot of shit that wasn't true. That we got to that point isn't proof that it was
nothing is.
so my current statement wasnt?
you have already contradicted yourself
paradoxically
have i?
Our knowledge base has evolved over time
so semantics(implied my statement was semantics) nothjing is semantics
nothing is something and everything is something, so i was just agreeing, yo.
@Beemann you are using the God of the gaps fallacy lol
No I'm not