Message from @Bayesed

Discord ID: 520064950266363925


2018-12-06 02:28:05 UTC  

@Salacious Swanky Cat I don't have to prove he didn't. You have to prove he did
It's not post hoc, it's statistics
So the only mentally healthy people are Christians and Christians are never not mentally unhealthy?
Is God not something? The statement was
>something can't come from nothing

2018-12-06 02:28:06 UTC  

SUBSCRIBE TO PEWDIEPIE

2018-12-06 02:28:13 UTC  

T GAY DIE

2018-12-06 02:28:41 UTC  

man

2018-12-06 02:28:51 UTC  

If I roll the dice, the chance of getting a 6 before is one in 6, afterwards it's 1 in 1

2018-12-06 02:28:51 UTC  

y can't something come from nothing? Isn't nothing something?

2018-12-06 02:29:10 UTC  

^^ good user name

2018-12-06 02:29:36 UTC  

The chances of a thing cease to matter after it's happened, unless you're trying to replicate it

2018-12-06 02:30:16 UTC  

What are the odds that life would exist the way it currently does? 100% lol. Of course it exists the way we see it

2018-12-06 02:30:19 UTC  

It also operates on the basis that everything was entirely random, which, ???

2018-12-06 02:30:25 UTC  

Nobody made that claim

2018-12-06 02:30:30 UTC  

Sub 👏 Scribe 👏

2018-12-06 02:30:40 UTC  

so racist.

2018-12-06 02:30:49 UTC  

hating on indians.

2018-12-06 02:30:56 UTC  

native fucking americans!

2018-12-06 02:30:58 UTC  

what did they ever do to you huh?

2018-12-06 02:31:19 UTC  

@Beemann Why would it not be the case? We, as you stated, evolved to have religious beliefs.

Your point on probability is post hoc. The chances to get to where we are are phenomenal. Write a model to predict that. Lol

2018-12-06 02:31:52 UTC  

what are the odds that 2+2 would equal 4????? out of how many numbers? such wow!

2018-12-06 02:32:07 UTC  

what makes you think 2+2=4?

2018-12-06 02:32:09 UTC  

Because religious beliefs can be beneficial and not true? Again, we're tribal as a species, and seek answers. We used to have shitty predictive models

2018-12-06 02:32:26 UTC  

thas the definition of our mathematical structure

2018-12-06 02:32:30 UTC  

@Bayesed nice strawman. Lol

2018-12-06 02:32:33 UTC  

We thought the earth was a fucking disc

2018-12-06 02:32:35 UTC  

oh, semantics, i see.

2018-12-06 02:32:41 UTC  
2018-12-06 02:32:42 UTC  

yes

2018-12-06 02:32:58 UTC  

everything is semantics

2018-12-06 02:33:04 UTC  

So we believed a lot of shit that wasn't true. That we got to that point isn't proof that it was

2018-12-06 02:33:04 UTC  

nothing is.

2018-12-06 02:33:14 UTC  

so my current statement wasnt?

2018-12-06 02:33:20 UTC  

you have already contradicted yourself

2018-12-06 02:33:27 UTC  

paradoxically

2018-12-06 02:33:32 UTC  

have i?

2018-12-06 02:33:48 UTC  

Our knowledge base has evolved over time

2018-12-06 02:33:57 UTC  

so semantics(implied my statement was semantics) nothjing is semantics

2018-12-06 02:34:20 UTC  

nothing is something and everything is something, so i was just agreeing, yo.

2018-12-06 02:34:22 UTC  

@Beemann you are using the God of the gaps fallacy lol

2018-12-06 02:34:29 UTC  

No I'm not

2018-12-06 02:34:35 UTC  

How are you reversing all of this?

2018-12-06 02:35:21 UTC  

"God of the gaps" is a theological perspective in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence. "

2018-12-06 02:35:28 UTC  

all this talk about the existence of god sure brings back memories, to like 10 years ago, when it was agreed upon that god does indeed not exist (at least in any sense described with religion)