It's designed by the guy who designed steemit.

Which runs dtube.

So then you can cut off parts of the world

on IPFS.

Well, not necessarily.

I mean,p there are cryptos which can be used even when states try to censor them.

But *some* decentralisation is better than the monopolies we currently have, no?

YouTube more like censor tube

you're gonna have to give me a lot more to go on than "decentralisation"

I mean, imagine we had a decentralised social media platform that could not be taken down by banks at this point.

I have.

I can't,

Cuz the banks are only the current go-to for that

companies can pressure ISP's to simply block social media

that isn't halal

Well yes. They could turn it all off.

But you're being fundamentalist.

Which is one of the problems in crypto, actually.

And everywhere else.

thats quite an accusation

I'm all for a better system,

But i'm not for yoloing to whatever is there, regardless of if it can work

People are fundamentalist about things, so shit on things that are *better* and *functional*.

Because they're not *perfect*

That's the SJWs to a T.

Explain to me, what the point is in giving money to a system that just gets blocked

In many cases, it can't be blocked.

I'm all for a better system, i want the ol "wild-west" internet back

"It can't be blocked" if i pull the plug it aint getting in

And to block them, you would have to cooperate across dozens of jurisdictions.

Or geoblock parts of the world.

What do you think Globalists do?

why does Merkel get her filthy paws in Polands jurisdictions?

They aren't doing that, yet.

Well, they're not geoblocking countries.

yet

cuz they don't have to

`companies can pressure ISP's to simply block social media`
About that, Telegram is still unblockable

They haven't managed to shutdown torrents, despite more than a decade of trying.

ANd IPFS is just torrents.

https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/1071052992999292930?s=20

they haven't tried it honestly

cuz the western world is still too free