Message from @Heteronymus Bosch
Discord ID: 520613343329779713
And everywhere else.
thats quite an accusation
I'm all for a better system,
But i'm not for yoloing to whatever is there, regardless of if it can work
People are fundamentalist about things, so shit on things that are *better* and *functional*.
Because they're not *perfect*
That's the SJWs to a T.
Explain to me, what the point is in giving money to a system that just gets blocked
In many cases, it can't be blocked.
I'm all for a better system, i want the ol "wild-west" internet back
"It can't be blocked" if i pull the plug it aint getting in
And to block them, you would have to cooperate across dozens of jurisdictions.
Or geoblock parts of the world.
What do you think Globalists do?
why does Merkel get her filthy paws in Polands jurisdictions?
They aren't doing that, yet.
Well, they're not geoblocking countries.
yet
cuz they don't have to
`companies can pressure ISP's to simply block social media`
About that, Telegram is still unblockable
ANd IPFS is just torrents.
they haven't tried it honestly
cuz the western world is still too free
give it time, it will erode and you'll have China levels of control if we don't reverse it
We'd complain if they do it, start riots etc
Well I would prefer supporting alternatives *now* than rejecting them in the hope that the situation deteriorates to the point we have to resort to pitchforks (literally).
IPFS is torrents + detailed analytics
Point being,
I'd love it if it works, but its based on the assumption that only one of the factions "evolves" its technology
which simply is too big a risk for me
blockchain = audit trail
I agree that a blockchain is an audit trail.
That's why we need to support decentralised blockchains.
Because teh state will get its grubby paws on blockchain.
Why do you think they are allowing it to survive for now.
cuz they don't see it as a threat
neither do i
it it just me that gets confused thinking they are on a bdsm server because of the name before they remember whos server this is?
There may be no threshold at which normies start rioting against Chinese-level censorship. The reasonable response to Apple/ADL imposing Chinese-level censorship on Apple customers would be to torch Apple stores.
No. They are allowing the open source community to innovate, and they will plagiarise those innovations and make all of this censorship look like absolutely nothing.