Except it is
People are either morally bound or by force
and if they're neither?
*survival of the fittest*
Neither what?
bound by morals or force
I they are neither they are free
*if
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
free to kill and free to die
That depends
Man is free to kill but not free from the consequences
But killing is not in mans best interests
unless its a murder-suicide pact
Thats like saying a society without morality at its core foundation will die and kill rampantly
unless it's your life on the line then it's okay to kill
If a person kills someone and then offs themselves, its consequence free
No morality is a must just not in the compulsive brute that is altruism
Altruism sucks
No benefit gained from it.
let's conspire to do smth
Altruism is a lie, people who help others aren't doing it cuz they're selfless, they do it cuz the satisfaction they feel is a better reward to them
Depends on the context
Satisfaction is better than demanding money
seen philly D today?
have not
i stopped following Phil
@wacka he did an oopsie
with better help
Eww Phil
I would say it's more like moral obligation
Philly d?
Philip DeFranco
Oh that guy
@AHeroQuest Id suggest you read Atlas Shrugged
"sup you beautiful bastards?" guy
hate him
Philly D is a product of collectivism
the story about the guy punchinghis pregnant wife was pretty crazy
esp his way of advertising shit. `i'd like to share with you smth THAT I LOVE TODAY`
