or FT
UK mainstream papers are shit
The Economist is probably the source I allow to influence my thinking the most
Thinking about getting a daily wire subscription
Except on the topic of China, I rarely even feel the need to bias-check them
When they start the extra two hours next year
Well, CRTV is dead...
Yeah it just became the blaze.
Like crtv was ever going anywhere lol
What about that emigrated Japanese??
I tried backing someone once.
Anti Neocon something
NHK (my most trusted source in general) and Economist have definite China bias, so I counter with SCMP
http://www.ancreport.com
eh?
jewish suicide bomber attacked Israel?
rt, bbc,pbn,aljazeera
kidding
BBC are "ok" just lazy and biased
BBC are OK???
they are all biased
as long as you know this they are a source
Tim McVey performed the second most deadly terrorist act on US soil in the name of Christ. His victims for mostly Christians.
yes but I expect christians to be nuts
Blasphemy!!!!!
this is the first time I've heard of a jewish suicide bomber attacking a jewish target
IIRC there were some "anarchist" bombers in the late 19th century early 1900s who were jewish butthey werent suicide bombers per se
and they werent attacking fellow jews
BBC is a good source except on Britain. I consider them to have a conflict of interest there.
heh
they're a lazy source
NPR is a good source and because of their donation model generally avoid government finance contamination.
Zionism has a very, very long and successful history with terror
Very effective, too
I subscribe to the Financial Times webedition (employee paid) The local newspaper for my region in my native tongue
long? uh no
The local newspaper i believe, i am very critical of their political coverage, as most their staff is affiliated with the same party, the social democrats.
period between the 1920s and 1950s
of which a lot was response to arab terrorism
something doesnt seem right
Long from a west coast Yankee perspective. We call stuff made in the 1930's historic, remember. :p
