None

I've only subscribed to indie creators, not legacy news sites.

I used to pay for youtube red but no more

@DrYuriMom None, why should I pay for things that make me sad?

nyt wash po and would like to subscribe to economist

or FT

UK mainstream papers are shit

The Economist is probably the source I allow to influence my thinking the most

Thinking about getting a daily wire subscription

Except on the topic of China, I rarely even feel the need to bias-check them

When they start the extra two hours next year

Well, CRTV is dead...

Yeah it just became the blaze.

Like crtv was ever going anywhere lol

What about that emigrated Japanese??

I tried backing someone once.

Anti Neocon something

NHK (my most trusted source in general) and Economist have definite China bias, so I counter with SCMP

http://www.ancreport.com

eh?

jewish suicide bomber attacked Israel?

rt, bbc,pbn,aljazeera

kidding

BBC are "ok" just lazy and biased

BBC are OK???

they are all biased

as long as you know this they are a source

Tim McVey performed the second most deadly terrorist act on US soil in the name of Christ. His victims for mostly Christians.

yes but I expect christians to be nuts

Blasphemy!!!!!

this is the first time I've heard of a jewish suicide bomber attacking a jewish target

IIRC there were some "anarchist" bombers in the late 19th century early 1900s who were jewish butthey werent suicide bombers per se

and they werent attacking fellow jews

BBC is a good source except on Britain. I consider them to have a conflict of interest there.

heh

they're a lazy source

NPR is a good source and because of their donation model generally avoid government finance contamination.

Zionism has a very, very long and successful history with terror

Very effective, too

I subscribe to the Financial Times webedition (employee paid)
The local newspaper for my region in my native tongue

long? uh no