wendy's doesn't do breakfest

so if a person finds attraction to non-consensual art work, they're immediately as bad as a serial rapist?

No

>if you're attracted to anime children, you're still a pedo
>but what if I'd headpat Yoshi

they should have asked wendy's if it was okay for them to draw her as lewd

This is going to sound very crude

then it would be consensual

that's the same concept you just said went for loli art lmao

Wot

or they should get the original on a treadmill and a salad diet so she can do porn

they're two different fuckin' things

Pedo = someone attracted to kids

Its a fucking thin as line

So thin

That

You're conflating actions (child molestation) with the attraction

So I did have a yoshi gif

Unless the actions were commited

that's nice

yeah nothing wrong with being a pedophile

And then saying that someone attracted to cartoon children isn't a pedo by extention
But that's dumb as fuck

so what if someone is attracted to the art but is utterly disgusted by any form of cp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cw76UDWaUQc

That doesnt work.

they, by definition, are not a pedophile, are they not?

On a logical vasis

Basis*

I wouldn't agree with that either tbh fam. Being a pedo is beyond shameful degeneracy

^

^

Im just arguing the devils advocate.

@Beemann well you arent doing anything wrong by being a pedophile.

there are dozens of things which people find sexually attractive in art, but do not find attraction to in real life.

But there are extremists that do

You are a damaged individual if you are sexually attracted to children

yeah.

Do you not take both halves?

but should we ban something because of extremists?

We do it all the time