it's the gravity

You guys see the vids of the transformer explosion in NYC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyLqkzKeJis&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2ijPx5hB6CJRzfsdioe9wDeLTdmgvMX9se12ZgSb6XWP98wNXlRcgrgHA

https://twitter.com/tara_arianna/status/1078475450802978817?s=19

Officer, ***I*** didn't murder the lady, physics did. All i did was pull the trigger.
Blame newton for figuring out that for every reaction there is an equal and oppsite raction.

your assumption is that people MUST panic when someone yells fire.

I disagree.

not most

some

if someone yells fire, the implication is that there is a direct threat to human life, because there is a fire

yes, and some people eat their own poop, i don't think laws should be designed around the exceptions

this causes a fight/flight response

People do panic if someone yells fire

that's not an exception

Ok, so what if a person purposefully intends to cause a panic to hurt people, they do it by yelling fire in a crowded threatre, should they be punished?

i already said no

My god

Well, I got even more specific

hiniku that's a bad argument, because categorically that's a slippery slope towards "what if someone wants to harm people so they hurt someone's feelings"

if someone intends to kill me by talking me to death, i also don't think they should be arrested on attempted murder charges.

hurting someone's feelings isn't the same as intending to kill / harm them

is that a powerplat malfunctioning?

on a physical level

Wait what? @GoldenPhoenix

Can I get an example

I hear Tim likes One Punch Man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLlbYc_sWg

i didn't say hurt my feelings.

i said talk me to death

Talk me to death makes no sense, causing panic to hurt does.

It's exploding

right, talking someone to death doesn't make sense, that's the point

She did way more physical harm to him, than he did to her

lol

That's more of a dive than professional soccer players

yelling doesn't hurt anyone

And that's saying something

@Hiniku intending to do harm by speech is a bad argument because that can be extrapolated into a rediculous curtailment of freedom of speech. your situation is good, but you're arguing the wrong point. It's not that they yelled fire (the speech), it's that they directly caused physical harm to a person

look

well, maybe their eardrums or something, which i would take issue with

Whoops, wrong channel.