Message from @GoldenPhoenix

Discord ID: 528042182532268062


2018-12-28 02:48:35 UTC  

Talk me to death makes no sense, causing panic to hurt does.

2018-12-28 02:48:42 UTC  

It's exploding

2018-12-28 02:48:46 UTC  

right, talking someone to death doesn't make sense, that's the point

2018-12-28 02:48:58 UTC  

She did way more physical harm to him, than he did to her

2018-12-28 02:49:10 UTC  

lol

2018-12-28 02:49:14 UTC  

That's more of a dive than professional soccer players

2018-12-28 02:49:19 UTC  

yelling doesn't hurt anyone

2018-12-28 02:49:21 UTC  

And that's saying something

2018-12-28 02:49:24 UTC  

@Hiniku intending to do harm by speech is a bad argument because that can be extrapolated into a rediculous curtailment of freedom of speech. your situation is good, but you're arguing the wrong point. It's not that they yelled fire (the speech), it's that they directly caused physical harm to a person

2018-12-28 02:49:27 UTC  

look

2018-12-28 02:49:31 UTC  

well, maybe their eardrums or something, which i would take issue with

2018-12-28 02:49:33 UTC  

Whoops, wrong channel.

2018-12-28 02:49:46 UTC  

people panicing is their own action

2018-12-28 02:49:53 UTC  

But my point is that you are making a false equivalence between talk to death and causing panic in a crowded space @Paradox

2018-12-28 02:49:53 UTC  

which they are responsible for

2018-12-28 02:50:14 UTC  

What caused them to panic

2018-12-28 02:50:17 UTC  

people don't panic without a stimulus, whether real or imagined

2018-12-28 02:50:23 UTC  

their stupidity

2018-12-28 02:50:39 UTC  

Good idea @GoldenPhoenix

2018-12-28 02:51:04 UTC  

yes, imagined. IE delusional/irrational.

2018-12-28 02:51:06 UTC  

that's not a way to run a legal system, otherwise every case of someone being taken advantage of can be chalked up to their personal stupidity

2018-12-28 02:51:21 UTC  

If you yelled fire, you are the direct harm of the people who panic, because you started the panic. @Paradox

2018-12-28 02:51:44 UTC  

No. They panic'd of their own accord in response to me shouting a word.

2018-12-28 02:51:55 UTC  

If someone kills themself because I write a sad song, am i responsible?

2018-12-28 02:52:16 UTC  

no, they had the choice to listen to it

2018-12-28 02:52:16 UTC  

So is it the bullets fault that some dies of a gun wound or is it the person who shot the gun?

2018-12-28 02:52:55 UTC  

Metaphorically, the people running in panic are the bullets of the one that yelled fire.

2018-12-28 02:53:11 UTC  

it's more complicated than that, but...

2018-12-28 02:53:43 UTC  

Either one understands context, or one doesn't.
https://giphy.com/gifs/week-media-person-RL0xU1daTlMoE

2018-12-28 02:53:44 UTC  

That's not a good straw man, hiniku.

2018-12-28 02:54:02 UTC  

You are also diminishing the urgency/importance of yelling fire in a theater falsely

2018-12-28 02:54:02 UTC  

If the person yelling fire actually trampled them, then he is actually causing violence

2018-12-28 02:54:06 UTC  

It's just a metaphor

2018-12-28 02:54:09 UTC  

otherwise, he's just yelling

2018-12-28 02:54:31 UTC  

sure it might be disruptive, someone being loud while u r trying to watch a movie, but it shouldn't be illegal.

2018-12-28 02:55:36 UTC  

It is a reasonable response to leave a crowded area if someone yelled fire, you act like this is an unnatural response.

2018-12-28 02:55:55 UTC  

Technically yes, but the person thst caused the panic should also be at fault since they are the one who caused the panic

2018-12-28 02:56:01 UTC  

you're talking about it sitting at a desk or on your phone in abstract. being "logical" about a high stress situation doesn't give proper representation of the event

2018-12-28 02:56:09 UTC  

panicing would be unreasonable, you could leave without panicing, you could...look around...

2018-12-28 02:56:26 UTC  

If someone is using that response, on purpose, to cause harm, it should be illegal

2018-12-28 02:56:45 UTC  

Anyone here plays dragonrealms?