Message from @LittleGiantJ

Discord ID: 530098887025885185


2019-01-02 19:00:41 UTC  

@GoldenPhoenix that argument still presupposes that there is right and wrong. You can’t prove that right and wrong exists with a materialistic worldview

2019-01-02 19:01:04 UTC  

gonna have to tell my gay friend he is destroying the west. along with dan from game grumps

2019-01-02 19:01:10 UTC  

LOL

2019-01-02 19:01:13 UTC  

you can't, but you can prove that there is a "I might be inconvenienced" vs "I will benefit"

2019-01-02 19:01:41 UTC  

but at least we can all agree china has the right idea when it comes to Muslims right? /s

2019-01-02 19:01:41 UTC  

Actually. Adultery and fornication are different...

2019-01-02 19:01:54 UTC  

Fornication is the Act of sex

2019-01-02 19:02:03 UTC  

Adultery is cheating on your spouse

2019-01-02 19:02:08 UTC  

Or simply sleeping around

2019-01-02 19:02:14 UTC  

fornication is sex without marriage, adultery is cheating

2019-01-02 19:02:38 UTC  

```gonna have to tell my gay friend he is destroying the west. along with dan from game grumps```
Not all gays are doing that but some are. And the real problem is that he or we let them do that shit.

2019-01-02 19:02:45 UTC  

@GoldenPhoenix still can’t extract that from a materialistic worldview

2019-01-02 19:02:53 UTC  

we should be on the streets and protest the parents of Desmond is Amazing

2019-01-02 19:02:56 UTC  

we let priests diddle kiddies too, your point?

2019-01-02 19:02:57 UTC  

Fornication is sex before being married. Adultery is having sex when you are married, but it's not your spouse.

You can fornicate without committing adultery, but you cannot commit adultery without fornication...

2019-01-02 19:03:03 UTC  

well all we know is and i qoute Rowan Atkinson : Fornicators line up infront of that small Guillotine over there

2019-01-02 19:03:05 UTC  

The reason for anti-homosexuality in religion was typically the case escpecially in the old times because mortalilty rates were a bitch, and maximizing offspring would help have many people in the religion for a stronger support network

2019-01-02 19:03:33 UTC  

Yeah

2019-01-02 19:03:39 UTC  

the plagues

2019-01-02 19:03:40 UTC  

wars

2019-01-02 19:03:43 UTC  

And they made observations on how baby-making works. They saw reproduction as the "right" way.

2019-01-02 19:03:45 UTC  

the flu

2019-01-02 19:03:50 UTC  

not to mention i'm sure pre modern medicine homosexuality has health problems

2019-01-02 19:03:57 UTC  

all these fucking health issues . average life was up to 34-45 in most areas

2019-01-02 19:04:02 UTC  

in fact, i would see any anal as being viewed as taboo

2019-01-02 19:04:12 UTC  

```The reason for anti-homosexuality in religion was typically the case escpecially in the old times because mortalilty rates were a bitch, and maximizing offspring would help have many people in the religion for a stronger support network```
That was one reason. I've seen somewhere that pedophilia was also part of that. And other degenerate shit....

2019-01-02 19:04:20 UTC  

shit on your dick is not generally good when you have good hygiene

2019-01-02 19:04:39 UTC  

@Stefan Payne though ironically the catholic church

2019-01-02 19:04:40 UTC  

can't imagine back in the times when the streets were literally paved with shit

2019-01-02 19:04:46 UTC  

how not? @Salacious Swanky Cat even in a materialistic view, you want to act in your own self interest. doing things that hurt others can be harmful to you, too, which is where you can derive the majority of morals from

2019-01-02 19:05:11 UTC  

if you look at Life expectancy and how they could try and make people be more readily available . gay people would be a hindrance to a tribe or a Civilization whos main export is expansion

2019-01-02 19:05:31 UTC  

And a lot of wrong-doing will make you enemies. It's more beneficial to be good than bad.

2019-01-02 19:05:38 UTC  

^^

2019-01-02 19:05:43 UTC  

Yup

2019-01-02 19:05:44 UTC  

There are selfish reasons to be "good".

2019-01-02 19:05:48 UTC  

true

2019-01-02 19:05:50 UTC  

@GoldenPhoenix that presupposes that something benefits and harms. How can you make a value judgment of anything if everything is just a bunch of chemical reactions.

2019-01-02 19:06:00 UTC  

but that goes to individual choices. that we cant control

2019-01-02 19:06:00 UTC  

@Walsp especially when there is supposed to be as many descendants as grains of sand and what not

2019-01-02 19:06:05 UTC  

to back up Phoenix point, its generally ill-advised to hurt others who have potential support networks. Increases the chances someone hurts you in return. not good if you want to keep your stuff intact

2019-01-02 19:06:23 UTC  

Ask hitler