shapiro (as well as traditionalists in general) would indeed be good to finaly burn society to the ground. Which i would like to see and warn against ever building a state ever again.

The founders definatly wouldnt have wanted a military.

the 2nd amendment specificly is so that individuals can defend the US.

*neccessary for the security of a free state" - meaning, all weapons on par and exceeding those that any rival nation might have

ICBMs, nuclear warheads and so on

January 20th antifa will be out in force.

Scumbags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Anut8JzRLmA

when people say the 2nd amendment was supposed to be for a militia, where did they think the weapons of those militias were meant to be stored?

That's nice

The US had a military when it was established, if the founders didn't want a military, why would they establish one.

The bulk of US media are tone deaf morons

Oh well

The best thing that could be done at this point is tipping off local police that do not know of these gatherings

NYC, DC, LA, any cities with large populations

Best thing to do is be armed and defend yourself

There is no Antifa presence out here on Long Island that I know of

Towns aren't too densly populated

also "militia" means every able-bodied member of society that can be called upon for its defense

also, shapiro wouldn't burn society to the ground, I highly doubt that.

also the US didn't have a military when it was established, they had a volunteer force of combined militia. the constitution itself didn't make any provision for military creation

@Wulfolme these militias did have artilery.

indeed, back then individuals owned battleships

or small groups, depending on the cost

Their was a military when the US was established and it was made offcial at the behest of washington a few years later.

@GoldenPhoenix he wouldnt burn society to the ground. But hes a traditionalist. Hed seriously try to supress men by cracking down on their hobbies so they can come back and fix society by providing for women - not realising peopple like him would be the first to be fixed

I have a baseball bat and a hatchet, neither would be appropriate to carry around

@Redneo have you actually heard his rhetoric? that's literally what he's against

also, how is that traditional in any sense of the word?

whats his stance on "childlike sexdolls" aka all sexdolls becouse you cant objectivly define that?

men have been shit on for thousands of years

yes you can

in the 1800s, men were convicted for crimes of their wives

and you didnt have the choice not to marry, either

you're cherry picking, but you can also objectively define it

youd have to pay bachelor taxes and at times were excluded from many jobs

@GoldenPhoenix and does he even oppose feminism? The first wave or the terrorists from the suffragettes?

does he use the typical wartime rethoric against men from other places such as arabs?

He supports equality feminism, which long ago reached its goals in the west, and fights against the modern branch that seeks to *reverse* perceived (whether true or not) historical oppression instead of balancing it out

feminism never strived for equality

I guess I'm referring to people like Christina Hoff Sommers