Message from @NativeInterface

Discord ID: 530792579025993728


2019-01-04 16:57:17 UTC  

I actually agree with paradox, I drive impaired all the time.
I'm ***not*** a better driver impaired, but i do drive with more care and deliberation.
I would also not drive if i thought i was too impaired.
but the laws cant be written that way.
Laws need to be black and white.

2019-01-04 16:57:21 UTC  

Reckless and careless driving are both charges

2019-01-04 16:57:34 UTC  

Should they be?

2019-01-04 16:57:37 UTC  

Yes

2019-01-04 16:57:40 UTC  

Where's the victim there?

2019-01-04 16:57:51 UTC  

well we're not really talking about what the law is
we're more talking about what the law should be

2019-01-04 16:57:54 UTC  

The people who are hit by people being negligent

2019-01-04 16:58:09 UTC  

But no1 was hit?

2019-01-04 16:58:17 UTC  

It's a preventative law

2019-01-04 16:58:27 UTC  

Right. A victimless law.

2019-01-04 16:58:32 UTC  

I'd rather see laws around cell phone usage.
Much worse than drving drunk, imo

2019-01-04 16:58:57 UTC  

That's like saying you can't arrest someone until they have shot a guy even though there's a gun to the dudes head

2019-01-04 16:59:12 UTC  

Well you couldn't arrest them for murder...

2019-01-04 16:59:19 UTC  

until after they shot him and he died.

2019-01-04 16:59:23 UTC  

You can arrest them for battery

2019-01-04 16:59:28 UTC  

but is there a victim before he pulled the trigger?

2019-01-04 16:59:32 UTC  

Yes

2019-01-04 16:59:35 UTC  

i'd say yes too

2019-01-04 16:59:49 UTC  

Yes. There is a victim.

2019-01-04 16:59:56 UTC  

That's why your little metaphor was bogus.

2019-01-04 17:00:12 UTC  

which metaphor?

2019-01-04 17:00:13 UTC  

How is threatening others on the road with your car not the same

2019-01-04 17:00:26 UTC  

Well you've escalated it

2019-01-04 17:00:38 UTC  

If you drive reckless and threaten others safety by doing so, it's no different

2019-01-04 17:01:01 UTC  

And you should be removed from the road as a result

2019-01-04 17:01:28 UTC  

yeah i think i agree that if you threaten the safety of others, you produce victims

2019-01-04 17:01:58 UTC  

a driver who was nearly hit by a drunk driver, is not a victim of a crash, but a victim of something

2019-01-04 17:02:06 UTC  

I don't agree. Unless the threat is reasonable.

2019-01-04 17:02:26 UTC  

Who determines that

2019-01-04 17:02:35 UTC  

Me. Beings it's my opinion...

2019-01-04 17:02:42 UTC  

That's not how it works

2019-01-04 17:02:54 UTC  

That is how my opinion works and what i agree with or not....

2019-01-04 17:03:12 UTC  

Yes but that doesn't make it inherently true

2019-01-04 17:03:31 UTC  

Why it's my opinion.

2019-01-04 17:03:31 UTC  

well then you agree that a victim is produced if the threat is reasonable at least

2019-01-04 17:03:52 UTC  

yes. I don't necessarily agree on what is considered resaonable

2019-01-04 17:03:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/530793499302559744/TempleOS.jpg

2019-01-04 17:04:01 UTC  

Opinions are not truth though

2019-01-04 17:04:03 UTC  

They are thoughts

2019-01-04 17:04:10 UTC  

if you don't think drunk driving is a reasonable enough threat, i'm not sure i agree, but i can respect that perspective

2019-01-04 17:04:34 UTC  

I think it can be.