Message from @NativeInterface

Discord ID: 530793415567474694


2019-01-04 16:59:23 UTC  

You can arrest them for battery

2019-01-04 16:59:28 UTC  

but is there a victim before he pulled the trigger?

2019-01-04 16:59:32 UTC  

Yes

2019-01-04 16:59:35 UTC  

i'd say yes too

2019-01-04 16:59:49 UTC  

Yes. There is a victim.

2019-01-04 16:59:56 UTC  

That's why your little metaphor was bogus.

2019-01-04 17:00:12 UTC  

which metaphor?

2019-01-04 17:00:13 UTC  

How is threatening others on the road with your car not the same

2019-01-04 17:00:26 UTC  

Well you've escalated it

2019-01-04 17:00:38 UTC  

If you drive reckless and threaten others safety by doing so, it's no different

2019-01-04 17:01:01 UTC  

And you should be removed from the road as a result

2019-01-04 17:01:28 UTC  

yeah i think i agree that if you threaten the safety of others, you produce victims

2019-01-04 17:01:58 UTC  

a driver who was nearly hit by a drunk driver, is not a victim of a crash, but a victim of something

2019-01-04 17:02:06 UTC  

I don't agree. Unless the threat is reasonable.

2019-01-04 17:02:26 UTC  

Who determines that

2019-01-04 17:02:35 UTC  

Me. Beings it's my opinion...

2019-01-04 17:02:42 UTC  

That's not how it works

2019-01-04 17:02:54 UTC  

That is how my opinion works and what i agree with or not....

2019-01-04 17:03:12 UTC  

Yes but that doesn't make it inherently true

2019-01-04 17:03:31 UTC  

Why it's my opinion.

2019-01-04 17:03:31 UTC  

well then you agree that a victim is produced if the threat is reasonable at least

2019-01-04 17:03:52 UTC  

yes. I don't necessarily agree on what is considered resaonable

2019-01-04 17:03:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/530793499302559744/TempleOS.jpg

2019-01-04 17:04:01 UTC  

Opinions are not truth though

2019-01-04 17:04:03 UTC  

They are thoughts

2019-01-04 17:04:10 UTC  

if you don't think drunk driving is a reasonable enough threat, i'm not sure i agree, but i can respect that perspective

2019-01-04 17:04:34 UTC  

I think it can be.

2019-01-04 17:04:37 UTC  

I don't think it always is.

2019-01-04 17:05:01 UTC  

yeah i see what you mean

2019-01-04 17:05:04 UTC  

It has to be considered either always a threat or never

2019-01-04 17:05:29 UTC  

What makes someone walking around pointing a loaded gun any people with their finger off the trigger any less of a reasonable threat?
Because its visible? Because you can actually see the threat?

2019-01-04 17:05:37 UTC  

Invisible threats are more dangerous

2019-01-04 17:05:55 UTC  

You can't predict the effects of someone drinking and driving, so you have to consider it to be dangerous if discovered

2019-01-04 17:06:10 UTC  

Well I don't have to...

2019-01-04 17:06:23 UTC  

So what's your proposal

2019-01-04 17:06:37 UTC  

Nothing. We are just talking.

2019-01-04 17:06:47 UTC  

Yes but there has to be a point to the discussion

2019-01-04 17:06:54 UTC  

Nah

2019-01-04 17:07:03 UTC  

the point was if victimless crimes should be considered real crimes

2019-01-04 17:07:08 UTC  

We were talking about legalizing victimless crimes.

2019-01-04 17:07:34 UTC  

since i think putting people at risk produces victims, i stand by my claim that victimless crimes should not be crimes