all the automation just magnifies the human effort, never replaces it

But when one person can go to war without the fear of getting shot then there’s a problem

I still don't understand what the mathematical arguments against UBI are.

catastrophic inflation

UBI is fine

Give a lot, take a little

It doesn't mean that nobody works.

Eventually you run out of a lot

yeah

in fact

what would you say is an acceptable amount of $ per month someone would need to survive on UBI?

i didnt work for some time precisly becouse we DONT have UBI

Idk probably 150

1500

becouse how welfare is handled now heavily penalises work

UBI wouldnt

But housing taxes are different

Food and shelter, basically.

Adjusted for inflation.

If I’m on SSI on the outskirts of LA where there’s far smaller houses I’m doing better than someone on SSI living in an apartment near downtown

Tbh the need to cut down on alot of the existing taxes

No, we neeed to cut down the government

And by that i mean

Yes, you would probably have to set it per county.

But it doesn’t mean because you get money you can afford what is available to you

remove the president or chancelor or Prime minister

Government is cancer

if you have 1500, and you implement UBI,

You need to multiply that by 7 billion

meaning ~10.500.000.000.000 dollar

per month

even in its lightest forms

7 billin?

every person on the planet?

You assume that everybody would be without a job.

Like in ragaholic video the fbi is useless

its UNIVERSAL income

not SELECTIVE

everyone gets it

@Undead Mockingbird no, someone with a job would still receive UBI

thats the poiint

its unconditional

Well, then I had the wrong definition.

It's not what Friedman was talking about then.