Message from @Glaice
Discord ID: 534496888855068692
first site they subscribe to basically
well
and youtube's just allowing it
like wtf
or get auto subscribed to if the autosub theory is correct
at least they included TYT in the gillette ad
SocialBlade has a projection of overtake in ~2 weeks
@.Not Sean hey man more ppl watching ur company's vids then that means more money for u as youtube and google
why didnt they use this clip of her?
rmember the google runs youtube as a net loss
as in they lose money each other running youtube
but they make it up with other incomes like google ads and shit elsewhere
youtube hasnt turned a profit i think in forever actually
like ever since it was acquired by google
>ana/tyt as a news source
😂
>Newsday on the mounted TV at Burger King. (Newsday is my regions local newspaper/TV station)
>"Most Americans don't support the border wall."
>Source is from a CNN poll.
Don't just parrot the crap that you see from a CNN poll Newsday, which likely is biased against the wall anyway. Plus, it's probably just a few thousand people's opinions and doesn't represent the true opinions of the American people as a whole.
Newsday is left-center bias according to Media Bias/Fact Check
Notes: Newsday is an American daily newspaper that primarily serves Nassau and Suffolk counties and the New York City borough of Queens on Long Island, although it is sold throughout the New York metropolitan area. Newsday has a left wing editorial bias, but reports with credible sourcing. (D. Van Zandt 5/18/2016)
not only did they pick a polling location most likely to give their desired result, they likely shaped results two-fold by picking who to ask and what results they decide to reject
like any 300+ lb woman with purple hair gets asked what they think
Bruh, the level to which news sources depend on each other is ridiculous.
while they avoid healthy sane looking women because they likely are neither feminist nor progressives
A concept that's lost today is the concept of 'Primary Sources' and 'Secondary Sources'.
If you're basing your news reporting entirely off of secondary sources, you're not a news company, you're a news aggregator.
if your sources are basing it off sources you are not even that, you are a circle jerk propagandist
Historically, the absolute BEST journalists have been primary sources for the things they've reported.
The undercover journalist that finds shit they're not supposed to.
and I'm willing to bet a lot of 'sources' used sources that use sources that finally track back to the first source
The funny thing is, someone like Project Veritas is more of a journalist than anyone writing articles about CNN articles.
Even though their methods are often called into question
a giant circle of 'sources' that all refer in a never ending self contained loop hoping you don't look to deep into it
cnn quote nbc, who quotes cbs, who quotes tyt, who quotes nyt, who quotes time magazine, who quotes bloomberg, who quotes cnn.....
shit like that
Well, that's part of the problem
so essentially there is no actual source because the entire thing is a self contained loop of quotes
You've got a room full of people. Everyone in that room has a buzzer. There's a precise moment when you need to hit the buzzer. If you hit the buzzer at the right moment, you get a bunch of money. Everyone who hits the buzzer after gets money, too, in relationship to how soon after they hit the buzzer after the first.
thats the cycle
CNN reports "we believe X might have happened"
NBC reports "X happened, according to CNN"
CBS reports "According to NBC and CNN, X happened
then CNN reports "according to Multiple sources X happened"
and finally TYT "X happened, and why Trump will lose 2020, OF COOOOOURSE"