Message from @Misomania
Discord ID: 534498959381626895
>Newsday on the mounted TV at Burger King. (Newsday is my regions local newspaper/TV station)
>"Most Americans don't support the border wall."
>Source is from a CNN poll.
Don't just parrot the crap that you see from a CNN poll Newsday, which likely is biased against the wall anyway. Plus, it's probably just a few thousand people's opinions and doesn't represent the true opinions of the American people as a whole.
Newsday is left-center bias according to Media Bias/Fact Check
Factual reporting is high
Notes: Newsday is an American daily newspaper that primarily serves Nassau and Suffolk counties and the New York City borough of Queens on Long Island, although it is sold throughout the New York metropolitan area. Newsday has a left wing editorial bias, but reports with credible sourcing. (D. Van Zandt 5/18/2016)
not only did they pick a polling location most likely to give their desired result, they likely shaped results two-fold by picking who to ask and what results they decide to reject
like any 300+ lb woman with purple hair gets asked what they think
Bruh, the level to which news sources depend on each other is ridiculous.
while they avoid healthy sane looking women because they likely are neither feminist nor progressives
A concept that's lost today is the concept of 'Primary Sources' and 'Secondary Sources'.
If you're basing your news reporting entirely off of secondary sources, you're not a news company, you're a news aggregator.
if your sources are basing it off sources you are not even that, you are a circle jerk propagandist
Historically, the absolute BEST journalists have been primary sources for the things they've reported.
The undercover journalist that finds shit they're not supposed to.
and I'm willing to bet a lot of 'sources' used sources that use sources that finally track back to the first source
The funny thing is, someone like Project Veritas is more of a journalist than anyone writing articles about CNN articles.
Even though their methods are often called into question
a giant circle of 'sources' that all refer in a never ending self contained loop hoping you don't look to deep into it
cnn quote nbc, who quotes cbs, who quotes tyt, who quotes nyt, who quotes time magazine, who quotes bloomberg, who quotes cnn.....
shit like that
Well, that's part of the problem
so essentially there is no actual source because the entire thing is a self contained loop of quotes
You've got a room full of people. Everyone in that room has a buzzer. There's a precise moment when you need to hit the buzzer. If you hit the buzzer at the right moment, you get a bunch of money. Everyone who hits the buzzer after gets money, too, in relationship to how soon after they hit the buzzer after the first.
thats the cycle
CNN reports "we believe X might have happened"
NBC reports "X happened, according to CNN"
CBS reports "According to NBC and CNN, X happened
then CNN reports "according to Multiple sources X happened"
and finally TYT "X happened, and why Trump will lose 2020, OF COOOOOURSE"
One or two people hit the buzzer, and suddenly, everyone's slamming their buzzers.
The problem with this game, is that there's no consequence for hitting your buzzer at the wrong time.
You just reset the game and pretend nothing happened.
This is an analogue to journalism.
sure, but the point is that one suggests it, the rest takes that suggestion as fact
And then the one suggesting it says "others have confirmed that we were right"
Oh, actually
that means it clearly all launched from the same singular propaganda outlet, and all these MSMs are in a giant circle jerk promoting it at the same time
yes
regardless of if they hit the buzzer at the right time, the first few STILL get a bunch of money.
that's an important thing to add.
most news reporting sources are just a mobius strip today, single sided never ending loop that feeds into itself
Laura Loomer trending on twitter again 😉 this time for jumping over the fence
gotta do something for all that attention
Something about Pelosi's house
https://twitter.com/willsommer/status/1084903339811393536 here's one of the threads
do you know the app "codecheck"?
where you scan the barcode of a product, and it tells you the ingredients, and if they might be harmful?