Message from @That Guy [ なに!?! ]
Discord ID: 539196503961370624
Doesn't mean you can't print screen, crop & paste
@mikeflarkin no they banned for loli with the justification that obscenity is illegal in the US.
which it is.
Defaming mohammed and hatespeech would be equaly covered under that
by their logic they support child sex slaves
They intentionaly made it so they have the ability to remove posts
they didnt have to. If they were supporting free speech, they wouldve designed the service in a way that it would be impossible to censor
Alast, they say they oppose decentralised speech cause someone may transmit childporn. But they support decentralised currency presumably cause they want to bux child sex slaves
That or their argument is shit
they definatly have never done anything good for free speech
When conservatives are convicted in american courts for anti-islamic speech im gonna laugh
No. Lol I is banned because child porn in the US
Its dissemination of child porn
Is the main reason most people cite. @Redneo
Although it's not child porn, and you can't really be jailed in the US for it, in other countries you can.
@That Guy [ なに!?! ] no, they cited the obscenity laws
Did they? Care to link?
nah it's not obscenity
it's just cp
i think a person is currently in trial because of that too
That's what they cited. @Redneo
>visual representations of the Sexual abuse of children
Just saying its obscene is not an accurate representation
I just looked up what code they cited
And that's the definition
yeah.
as i said, obscenity laws
Torba wrote on GAB…
“Real simple: we don’t welcome that garbage here. Take it to Mastodon if you want to share cartoons depicting the abuse, nudity, and sexual fetishization of children, which is illegal in many countries. Debate the legal grey area in the US all you want, but to us 18 USC 1466A is pretty clear and I think 99% of people would agree with us. Loli is cancer and demonic.
I feel like that's a broad generalization.
This is very specific.
Right
Yet they do attack free speech in general
Saying decentralised solutions would be something they wouldnt support cause illegal stuff could be disseminated there
If you accept that anyone, including yourself, can censor, you are preparing that anything could eventualy be censored
Legal or explicitly illegal doesnt make even the slightest difference there
if its impossible to censor its impossible to censor. simple as that
You said "obscenity is illegal in the US" that's a gross over generalization of what was cited
This is very specific
I believe in free speech