Message from @That Guy [ なに!?! ]
Discord ID: 539199462518685709
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
That's what they cited. @Redneo
>visual representations of the Sexual abuse of children
Just saying its obscene is not an accurate representation
I just looked up what code they cited
And that's the definition
yeah.
as i said, obscenity laws
Torba wrote on GAB…
“Real simple: we don’t welcome that garbage here. Take it to Mastodon if you want to share cartoons depicting the abuse, nudity, and sexual fetishization of children, which is illegal in many countries. Debate the legal grey area in the US all you want, but to us 18 USC 1466A is pretty clear and I think 99% of people would agree with us. Loli is cancer and demonic.
I feel like that's a broad generalization.
This is very specific.
Right
Yet they do attack free speech in general
Saying decentralised solutions would be something they wouldnt support cause illegal stuff could be disseminated there
If you accept that anyone, including yourself, can censor, you are preparing that anything could eventualy be censored
Legal or explicitly illegal doesnt make even the slightest difference there
if its impossible to censor its impossible to censor. simple as that
You said "obscenity is illegal in the US" that's a gross over generalization of what was cited
This is very specific
I'm no absolutist, however
But it sounds like you are(?)
I don't want to mischaracterize you
A) I guess you could say that, b)gab is absolutist in terms of the right of anyone to give money to anyone so their justification for opposing free speech doesnt hold unless they actualy believe there is nothing you could give money for that should be illegal
i like how loli hentai has its own section in that sentence
the fuck
do we need to use exhausting clarifications like Mandatory Acceptance of Offensive Speech
They don't want anyone they don't approve of to be on the itnernet
Giving money to people is legal, but what they banned is not
There's already almost 7,000 signatures.
Where is this wrong?
Really?
7k already
Something about that seems suspect
Damn
@That Guy [ なに!?! ] giving money to a terrorist group or to buy a sexslave is not legal. But protected by crypto or cash.
Especially since the post itself has only 19 likes
someone dug this up