Message from @Redneo
Discord ID: 539192261477531648
woah woah we prefer the term basketball-shekel americans
I'm trying to stay up to using Minds and Gab
but it's like
basketball shekel americans lol
I'm so used to twatter and fuckbook taht I don't know how to find people
we had shekels n shieeettttt
I think right now a lot of big time creators aren't on gab or minds, it's mostly just regular people atm
And the ones that have haven't made the switch fully away from Twitter, so even if they have a gab account they probably don't use it as much as they do Twitter. Just from what I've seen.
stfu nigger kike
nah lol you're right.
gab's probably not very active anyway
I know they're working on a browser extension that seems pretty cool, you can use it to comment on specific pages, kinda like Disqus but more free speech
That'd be neat
maybe all hope isnt lost
Gab has protected their tweets
Was it definitely Gab that did it? It honestly seems like more Twitter's style since it means you can't retweet.
another one
another false termination to add to the board
Doesn't mean you can't print screen, crop & paste
which it is.
Defaming mohammed and hatespeech would be equaly covered under that
by their logic they support child sex slaves
They intentionaly made it so they have the ability to remove posts
they didnt have to. If they were supporting free speech, they wouldve designed the service in a way that it would be impossible to censor
Alast, they say they oppose decentralised speech cause someone may transmit childporn. But they support decentralised currency presumably cause they want to bux child sex slaves
That or their argument is shit
they definatly have never done anything good for free speech
When conservatives are convicted in american courts for anti-islamic speech im gonna laugh
No. Lol I is banned because child porn in the US
Its dissemination of child porn
Is the main reason most people cite. @Redneo
Although it's not child porn, and you can't really be jailed in the US for it, in other countries you can.
@That Guy [ なに!?! ] no, they cited the obscenity laws
Did they? Care to link?
nah it's not obscenity
it's just cp
i think a person is currently in trial because of that too
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
That's what they cited. @Redneo