Thats not saying that all regulations are bad.

@Strufa if you use their services instead of the free alternatives thats on you

we should actually make a regulation to avoid monopolies

the US is not a pure free market economy

it's a mixed market

@Strufa no, that will lead to monopolies.

But some are systematically designed to keep one monopoly in power over competing companies.

everything will lead to monopolies

lol

he means Anti-thrust laws

thats the nature of production

oh, you silly goyim ...

oy

veh

try to open a new bank and see how it works out

@Strufa well, the tech companies sure as hell do not have a monopoly

if it does, you're in a free market

i don't have the moolah for a bank 😉

Ok, intellectual property rights, have they gone too far?

bank wont loan me money

as if banks had money

look at internet providers in USA

how its that not a monopoly?

it is

@Strufa you dont have to use US based internet providers.

theres satelites

but they pay the anti-thrust people to look the other way

Hold on.

you CAN use local ISPs, though

radio frequency operators are given a monopoly and only because they have that monopoly can the system work at all

There are a lot of misunderstandings about monopolies.

if you can pay away your violation of market laws, you're no longer in a free market

if you can't buy a slave, you're not in a free market

In law, there is the language of how much a company "controls" of a market share, which can be very misleading.

Internet Providers, ahhh that one. Yeah the right-away legislation is so regulated by each of the states, that its impossible to compete. So yeah regulation did it again.

found the ancap

@Ranko the US has slaves you can buy, h2b visa slaves

A company can be the only one in a particular market without having control over it.

you still have to pay those though @Misomania

i want an american slave, not that cheap bootleg stuff

isn't it that if it controls more than 80% of the market its a monopoly?