Message from @Salacious Swanky Cat

Discord ID: 543518117155045387


2019-02-08 19:40:44 UTC  

im jokin

2019-02-08 19:40:51 UTC  

IM a JRE fan

2019-02-08 19:40:54 UTC  

just joined

2019-02-08 19:40:56 UTC  

come forward get your teeth smoked

2019-02-08 19:40:59 UTC  

word

2019-02-08 19:41:02 UTC  

cuz Timmy come on JRE

2019-02-08 19:41:08 UTC  

idk TIm befero todday

2019-02-08 19:41:13 UTC  

he cool

2019-02-08 19:41:21 UTC  

Walk without rhythm
It won't attract the worm

2019-02-08 19:41:49 UTC  

I was arguing about Global Warming on another board and in the process discovered an interesting article that claimed excess CO2 is actually repairing the holes in the Ozone Layer. Funny how that didn't get any attention at all. I'm old enough to remember when the holes in the Ozone Layer was going kill us all with melanoma before we turned 20.

2019-02-08 19:41:51 UTC  

@Marcus_Summers tell me, do you type with these hands?

2019-02-08 19:41:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/543516837694930957/300px-Main_droite_1_an.png

2019-02-08 19:41:56 UTC  

ye

2019-02-08 19:42:01 UTC  

look into it

2019-02-08 19:42:07 UTC  

down syndrome

2019-02-08 19:42:14 UTC  

💯

2019-02-08 19:42:32 UTC  

Did they ever explain why the rise of temperatures preceded rise in CO2?

2019-02-08 19:44:57 UTC  

@Undead Mockingbird Nope. Nor were they convinced that skepticism is the appropriate response when fabrications, mistakes and out-right fraud is exposed almost every time the UN produces a "climate report." Like when they claimed that the US was spending more money on storm repair every year when their numbers came from "speculation" and the actual numbers spent on storm damage had be going down for over a decade.

2019-02-08 19:46:57 UTC  

Eh. Storm damage spending is a bad metric for determining storm intensity anyways. It would be far more accurate to compare wind speeds, air pressure, temperatures, etc.

2019-02-08 19:47:54 UTC  

even if everything they say was correct, it's not obvious what the right response would be

2019-02-08 19:48:13 UTC  

@Salacious Swanky Cat Sure, but if you want a good keynote to talk about at your Climate Panel to demonstrate the IMMEDIATE costs of global warming then what better than to talk about the cost of storm damage cleanup?

2019-02-08 19:49:04 UTC  

Which is exactly what they all did. Then when it was exposed as another hoax the UN claimed it was a minor piece of their report and was in no way an indication of the validity of their other claims.

2019-02-08 19:49:22 UTC  

@CasualSailor I guess, but I still think it’s a bad proxy.

2019-02-08 19:49:37 UTC  

Noam Chomsky

2019-02-08 19:49:52 UTC  

GLobal Warming

2019-02-08 19:49:58 UTC  

chomsky should have been content with being a linguist

2019-02-08 19:50:00 UTC  

Crusade or not?

2019-02-08 19:50:18 UTC  

I enjoy Sowell here

2019-02-08 19:50:34 UTC  

sowell is based

2019-02-08 19:50:39 UTC  

facts

2019-02-08 19:50:43 UTC  

ultra facts

2019-02-08 19:50:54 UTC  

Sowell is the best indeed.

2019-02-08 19:51:00 UTC  

one of the most based men on the planet

2019-02-08 19:51:02 UTC  

Øbama ended all manned space flight programs but increased NASA's budget. What for? To provide scientific evidence of global warming. Not to prove or disprove since that debate was settled by Al Gore. But simply to provide evidence to support the theory. Want to guess what the bureaucrats at NASA found? You guessed it. Scientific proof of global warming. And their budget increase was extended.

2019-02-08 19:51:32 UTC  

either way, you don't produce good science by making it politically incorrect to ask questions about it

2019-02-08 19:51:35 UTC  

It occures to me that if we depopulated the developing countries the majority of the toxicity damaging the planet would stop

2019-02-08 19:51:50 UTC  

yes, like china

2019-02-08 19:51:51 UTC  

or india