Message from @Marcus_Summers
Discord ID: 543516582710738964
@CasualSailor you mean to tell me you didn't just fall for every 4chan prank like an actual retard?
🦀
crab rave is a dog whistle to white supremacists
it's a crab whistle, practically
lololol
@Witan Remember when Newt Gingrich was called a racist for calling Øbama the "food stamp" president because more people were on food stamps under his presidency than every before? Then Gingrich asked why they would think he was talking about black people and they responded, because racists think all blacks are on foodstamps. Checkmate.
Speaking of laughing at Bush, while I do kinda wonder if Stewart was the beginning of the left's insanity, the dude did at least actually care about people. The effort he did for the NYC first responders was actually good. And man does he hate politicians now.
good ole newt
i never understood parents who called their kids newt, though
@CasualSailor remember how the "ok" hand gesture was appropriated by the alt-right (somehow???) or when posting "it's okay to be white" meant that it's time to genocide minorities?
good times
@Undead Mockingbird It's like the Jonny Cash song, A Boy Named Sue. It's guaranteed to produce someone who can fight.
direct energy weapons, atmospheric injections
look into it
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
im sorry, i don't speak crazy person
im jokin
just joined
come forward get your teeth smoked
word
cuz Timmy come on JRE
idk TIm befero todday
he cool
Walk without rhythm
It won't attract the worm
I was arguing about Global Warming on another board and in the process discovered an interesting article that claimed excess CO2 is actually repairing the holes in the Ozone Layer. Funny how that didn't get any attention at all. I'm old enough to remember when the holes in the Ozone Layer was going kill us all with melanoma before we turned 20.
@Marcus_Summers tell me, do you type with these hands?
ye
look into it
down syndrome
💯
Did they ever explain why the rise of temperatures preceded rise in CO2?
@Undead Mockingbird Nope. Nor were they convinced that skepticism is the appropriate response when fabrications, mistakes and out-right fraud is exposed almost every time the UN produces a "climate report." Like when they claimed that the US was spending more money on storm repair every year when their numbers came from "speculation" and the actual numbers spent on storm damage had be going down for over a decade.
Eh. Storm damage spending is a bad metric for determining storm intensity anyways. It would be far more accurate to compare wind speeds, air pressure, temperatures, etc.
even if everything they say was correct, it's not obvious what the right response would be