Does not mean it is the best tool to apply to everything

THat is the fundamental difference in argumentation between Francis Bacon and Karl Popper.

But no one else would

mm bacon

Otherwise we get glacial feminism or somesuch

bacon poppers

that sounds good

gonna make that sometime

Eh, anyway. I need coffee.

there is objective truth, and there is the attempt to approximate objective truth to the best of our abilities with varying success between individuals

Mongloids are very sleepy.

Scientific method is a far more reliable tool for figuring out stuff that actually works.

if they're sleepy they need coffee 😉

i think someone can objectively be more rational than someone else

you're looking for the word "tiring"

or exhausting

Regardless of how I feel about the hot stove, it will burn my skin all the same

SCIENCE

the thing is, your view of rationality is dictated by your beliefs @NativeInterface

Iksio lel

thats irrational!! everyone knows the reason you get burnt is cuz its actually GODS STOVE, and he's punishing you for touching it @Uksio

well why does that matter?

it results in people having different conclusions about reality

what is reality tho

Determinitstic universe removes free will though

who has a better grasp on reality

you?

or me?

But bible implies free will

reality is what is outside of the mind

Because perspective is really important when discussing ethics and emotions

So what is it?

but you can't comprehend what is outside of your mind

everything you see and experience is in your mind

this could all be fake

all part of a fever dream

You can make models of it.

I think therefore I am Prodigy

You can test stuff and reference it with others.

hitting us with them Decartes powah

exactly @Dr.Wol