If I attack an argument by attacking the person, should I not also be able to seek to substantiate an argument by not attacking but elevating a person?

it's also called a "false expert" I think

what are you talking

different perspetice of a latin word?

What are we even talking about?

Why is there no mirror case for ad hominem that is based on the same fallacious reasoning?

what is the litral translation of ad homiesiesn

there is Mockingbird, its called being "intellectually dishonest"

**BEE#0001** just left the server.

Expert? No I just do a lot of research and talk to people to get better on the ground understandings.

lol

because there is, but it's an appeal to experts

he's gone

kek

F

I guess.

I broke the thread.

dont heal it

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/463054787336732683/545410219728044043/Abandon_Thread.gif

break it like blizzard killed wow with cataclysm

waht

So, what is everyone's favorite type of cheese?

but ad-hominem is basically just another name for "bias" Undead

personality bias

ad homien sounds sounds like used to block conversation

fuck it

it is just that

aids hemorrhoids

If you are biased one way due to a person, should it not be possible to be biased the other way as well?

yes, it's a fallacious argument in which you appeal to a person's character to either attack or defend an argument, rather than the premeses themselves

So then ad hominem should exist in the negative and positive.

I submit this point for your gentlemen's consideration.

yes thats called bias, or tribalism

"Well CNN said it so of course it is the truth!"

why is this important?

what is on the line?

your life

what happens if you dont have aids hemorrhoids?

mr. bond

because, hitler was judged as Time man of the year, so he did nothing wrong

@Undead Mockingbird i'd say Tribalism is a close word
"facts don't matter cuz i'm siding with this person cuz i like them"