Mainly because, like you mentioned, someone's probably going to fill the space left by someone else.

its human nature

once a group is a formed a government is formed

Power vacuums are destructive

This natural instinct to form groups and interact socially with other people seems to draw people into power.

destructive things aren't always bad

anarchy is self explanatory, communism quickly ceases to be populist, democracy could work but in its current state is incredibly vulnerable in times of crisis

humans are instinctively hierarchal.

Actual anarchy in place of legislation just doesn't work-

anarchism and globalism/internationalism have one thing in common, they both disregard the tribalistic hierarchal nature of mankind and therefore are both doomed to failure because they are not ideologies that advocate for something natural rather they advocate for something that is not natural

This discord is a hierarchal

^

Look at the ranks

Oh heck I'm out of Gulag

@VanishedA97 idealistic is the word you were looking for

thank you ruger

Dank is the dictator and purple fags are self explanatory

Dankula is the monarch

and this is why rat is a permawhitey.

A lot of governmental systems that give power to a very large number of people are pretty idealistic, because there's at least going to be a few people in that very large group that're better at, or more hungry for power than the others.

Mikes getting all uppity again

@coattailsandbowties ok

the purples are the nobles that do shit

Those who lead, those who follow and all that bollocks.

everyone else is just varying degrees of peasant

Purples are shit head secret police

Gay

@VanishedA97 much of the problems I have with democracy stem from that, it creates internal strife and divide in a country

well i mean you can try dictatorships

theres way less strife and divide

what form of government doesnt?

I think the UK Parliament/Ruler system works if the Ruler actually used powers still

Communism because you can't speak up

no system created by human beings lacks flaws

USSR under stalin had a weirdly low dissent rate

I've found a new favourite reaction img it's so beautiful

Problem with dictatorships is that, even though everything's united under one banner, they generally lack stability. Once you've made it to the top, you realise how many people want to kick you off of your tower.

there is no perfect system

@TERMIN8R because they put down anyone who disagreed with them.

sorry about this boys, but its the night before the election, i think its worthy of some general chat

ew it's an american