Message from @Millihex
Discord ID: 518861798229803028
'
i mean, i really dont care, its just the weirdest/dumbest criticism ive ever heard
Oh Dr.phil?
Phillip defranco
Oh, I stopped watching him. He seems to care too much about LA bullshit.
"Fuck me in the ass and call me a fag", @Weebsama 2018
hah gay
nice.
I stopped watching cause half his shit and his image is closer to a tabloid, the other half is real good but fuck if I want to sit through that shit.
And the circlejerk around him is pretty annoying
i don't watch him, but i wouldn't say he's clickbaity. thumbs are all the same (him + 2/3 of the things he's covering) and the titles are just a list of topics
Jews > Gays > Blacks > Whiteys
wouldn't say he tends to put scandalous titles like "NINJA DID WHAT???!!"
Top 10 squirts of all time
Anyone watch silicon valley?
I'm hyped for Season 2
Oh and Mike Judge's other show got a new season
Ave Satanas
does mr repzion still sell stinky socks?
He's basically hipster keemstar at this point.
Honestly who cares about some celebrities or why some dick face got fired from Chipotle.
Is the phrase “windowlicker” one word or two words?
Sorta sensationalist
It can be either, depends on how you styzlie it
Yeah
I hate Ninja tbh
Oh ok
'windowlicker' as one word works better as an adjective, e.i. windowlicking faggot
Thanks
He cant take a loss.
I'm far more interested in early-mid 20th century history and studying for my exams
but window licker is better as the subject, i.e. you window licker
but that's up to what one likes
I'd say one word, it would have been hyphenated in the past but now people don't reyt do it
So windowlicker is one object now. As in, you are a windowlicker, you might not actually lick windows, but you are a windowlicker
compound word. One word.
wouldn't call that sensationalist lol
like the lad puts pictures relevent to the topics and the title also contains references to the topics in the video, thats directly opposite of the literal definition of clickbait
Clickbait is really anything that gets you to click, I suppose it's not the fairest critique since everything is technically clickbait. But it is absolutely sensationalist.
<@&498259609316884520>