Although that video was 7 months ago.

Does anyone here think that clayton county is the most right in the supreme court case Bostock V Clayton County?

The moon landings are real **change my mind.**

cogdis

Hello fellas

Because it’s flat

it just is

tbh, 'because it is', isn't an argument

yeah but it is

@Ultimate Spice Impossible. only YOU can change your mind.

If you are a truth seeker, you will ask yourself questions, seek the answers and come to a conclusion.

if you are not, then....nothing we can do to help.

But happy to try to answer any specific questions you may have after your investigation.

I've asked myself that question, sought for answers and came to the conclusion that the moon landing is, as far as I can see, real.
At least, dust particles was pretty much impossible to animate like that in those days unless you manage to film it that way. To film it that way you need the gravitational force of the moon, and not the earth.

@Flat Earth PhD It was impossible to fake the moon landings

Technology was not advanced enough to fake something of that scale.

It would cost even more to fake it than to just go to the moon.

That I doubt, but it would be obvious

@Jondar02 To get the technology to be able to replicate the direction of light shown on the moon landing they would need an extremely powerful laser light, something that was still new to the world at the time and costed ridiculous amounts of money to manufacture.

On top of this

If the moon landings were fake the Soviets would've said something about it.

On the other hand, the tech to land on the moon wasn't available either, but either way it wasn't fake that's for sure

ROTFLMAO

100% fake

Even my 75yr old non-internet-connected father knows this.

For your entertainment...

"we don't have the technology anymore"
when did anyone claim that we dont have the tech anymore, the space exploration tech is only improving, and we might get consumer space flight within the next few years

and we're even getting relatively close to sending humans to Mars

1. So? He has the right to believe that, but that's not an argument
2. No, but they fell sometimes because idk a different force of gravity. As you might notice, they even had prepared and trained for the situation
3. An automatic camera. Tracking things is quite easy if the things are large and clearly visible. They could even have hard programmed it since all things could be calculated beforehand.
4. Things needed to be as light as possible, and the moon has a weaker gravity so not much is needed. Also it's not cardboard.
5. Is that an argument?
6. Technology has changed. We have more issues with the Van Allen belt with today's tech. And most importantly, there's no spacerace so they care a bit more about human life now.

7. Nice pic, can't find the argument though

@marten.aap2.0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y

cope

@Jondar02 LOL. give up :). we've heard the ridiculous excuses ad nauseum....

so have we 🙂