and listed a bunch of processes

I assumed you understood the jargon

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/484516084846952451/663139028161527835/Mirage_2.gif

No, you aren't wrong for thinking that most flat earthers believe all photos showing a globe are photoshopped by NASA. You are wrong for not assuming that most Flat Earthers (which are people just like me and you) have the tendency to follow along with bandwagons that look to support or defend against a globe earth.

The story and details behind the article of the first photo of earth taken from a high altitude (I won't say outer space) on the 24th of October 1946 seems fishy but I won't dwell on my feelings of it.

But I can tell you that the picture doesn't show a curved horizon and you can test that yourself with a ruler or a piece of paper. Although indeed it is at an angle which is easily provable.

I'm never fully satisfied until I get the chance to do a high altitude recording myself with a non fish eye lens camera lens. But other independent researchers have shown a straight horizon without fish eye lens cameras.

You must not assume that all flat earthers agree on the same things regarding flat earth as I do not agree with the ice wall more over the dome neither do I agree with the most popular model of the FE. But I do agree with many observable and sensible proofs that we can all agree on.
@baldmartinyt

@California Nightmare 3.0 thank you for that little gif thing, it’s really pretty

Np

@RadRhys https://youtu.be/vj9rXJPpuUw
This is the video

We see one side because the moon rotates at a rate tandem with the Earth.

The cause is, of course, you don't see the 'dark side'

For an object which was formed from accreted matter after an impact with the Earth, that isn't an unlikely eventuality at all.

Isn't a large part of that 'atmospheric distortion' tidal phenomena?

@Lampz i have used your recommended method of measuring the curvature of the first photo taken from a high altitude and have found a curvature, what i did was i took a ruler, firstly tested if it was in fact straight enough to carry on the measurement by first holding it against straight items like the edge of my computer screen, and to no surprise it was straight, so then i carried on to measure said photo by getting the two ends of the ruler and making sure the ends were on the horizon, and i decided that if i couldnt see the planet through the ruler, as it was transparent, then the photo is in fact presenting a flat earth, but if i could see it through the ruler then it was showing a round earth, and sure enough the image was showing a round earth, and just to be sure i tried this method on the same photo uploaded by different people and got the same results

I have a quick question

Why lie about the shape of the Earth

Anyone?

:/

apparently to "Hide god" But why tf would you do that

I would love to see god, sounds fantastic

Why would you 'hide god'

The main reason they are staying appears to be money. @Daiel

But then again, you don't need NASA to fund and finance illegal or unconventional groups.

The US already does that.

Ergo, you don't need to setup a lemonade stand to sell cocaine.

Cocaine?

Consider it as an analogy.

NASA launders the money

@Daiel why wouldn’t you?

Because that sounds like a really stupid and useless idea

Why is it stupid and useless?

Why would i hide god

Why wouldn’t you?

Because there's no point in doing that

@baldmartinyt Just to make sure we are on the same page. Could you show me an example of what you invision a curved horizon to look like? Of course in your world view depending on the altitude you are more likely to see more or less. But it seems we have conflicting invisionments of what a curved horizon looks like.

@Daiel why not?

I guess this debate is just going to be us going in circles for hours so I'm just going to leave now

Ok