I saw that previous comment, tho.

@Holocene what is your proof of a globe

Satellite imagery, radiation distortion(since it comes through a curved ozone layer), travel that can circumnavigate the globe in a straight line of travel, general orbit or satellites that we can view in our day to day lives, the tide, tectonic plate interactions across the whole surface, and more

@California Nightmare 3.0

What do you mean when you say "it is scientifically unproven?"

Gravity, that is.

Ah yes, is this the upwards accelerating disc theory

1.There are no real pictures of earth from space
2.How can you verify that claim about radiation
3.Show me one person who has circumnavigated the earth in a straight line.Must also have been replicated
4.Satellites are not in space, they are balloons
5.why are tectonic planets exclusive to a globe

@Holocene

You presume indeed that there are no real pictures of the Earth, but that's a separate matter.

http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/KH-12-Kennan-Keyhole-Spy-Satellite-USA129.jpg

Pretty odd looking balloon

I’ll leave 1

Also, how can a HAB work at 301km in altitude?

2.) All waves can be distorted or bent by moving through a different curved medium. We can measure the distortion angle and see that there is a curved change of medium. The lenses in your glasses testify to this
3.) commercial travel and piloting systems RELY off of the fact that the earth is a globe. This is replicated every day.
4.) there is no material that can survive the acceleration of being hurtled into space from the ground at tens of thousands of miles per hour into orbit thousands of miles above the surface Even the strongest gauss cannons don’t stand a chance at getting material into low earth orbit.
6.) Tectonic plate interactions cause a ripple effect that can go around the globe many times, this background noise elimination is a large portion of the seismologists’ jobs.

if i recall properly they also don't believe in mathematics.

they think it is fake

no way @Saturn

@Holocene they have stated numerous times that math isn't reality, ignoring the fact that it is deduced from real life.

At what point do they say it’s fake, because it is easy to show 1+1 = 2 in real life

Wacky

@California Nightmare 3.0 see above btw

Hold on I’m in another chat

all g

@-BigBB416 - but me n penguin were listening to him so??

"Thereupon, at his command, we piled mountain upon mountain and on the topmost peak we reared engines which flung molten rocks against the divine habitations. The celestial host was taken unaware and from the abodes of glory there issued groans and cries of terror. And even then we thought to re-enter in triumph on our high estate, but the Mountain of God was wreathed with lightnings, and thunderbolts, falling on our fortress, crushed it to dust. After this fresh disaster, the Seraph remained awhile in meditation, his head buried in his hands. At length he raised his darkened visage. Now he was Satan, greater than Lucifer. Steadfast and loyal the angels thronged about him.

@Mode4Truthguy just as a listener, what makes the satanic canon a legitimate source to you?

1 Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

<#587834333902143520>

<#564598119590002708>

Bois Bois Bois the earth is a dinosaur duhh

Here guys you are intelligent so see if you can decrypt the zodiac 340 cipher

( iv been working on it a few days now)

I'll post it

Well looks like odnt have permit to post it

Just Google it. It's still unsolved

Goodluck

Please note that it's possible its all gibberish no one really knows.

zodiac boring

I won't argue that