and what is that?

how do you feel about earth? @Godfrey Greenwood

chilly, even

technically, can we really say that is earth and not Hell, though?

i mean look at it throughout history

also, spiders.

No.

Yikes.

trust your senses and not the actual empirical data

Because our senses are by-far the best way of determining anything.

"you won't find evidence in science books and 'peer-reviewed articles.'"

Except for the notion that, indeed, most 'peer-reviewed' articles are not apart of the "system."

So, in truth, you would be able to find a peer-reviewed article proving it correct.

Such would even be empirical.

Indeed, the whole point of peer-reviewing is running past your work by numerous people who can validate the truthfulness of what you are saying.

People who, often as it is, know more on the subject matter than you.

Otherwise, it'd be a point of redundancy.

Of note, I do believe in the Earth we live in, too.

That is indeed one thing we have in common.

Imagine unironically blaming Jews as a whole for things.

Oh no.

Interestingly, that falling 'clip' appears to of been struck just before moving.

That'd explain such pretty well.

Newton's First Law and all.

You have an interesting method of devaluing one's argument, Logan.

No, no it isn't.

Facts are empirical.

Not subjective.

It might have something to do with a knife.

Anyways, the opposite side of that spectrum isn't exactly beneficial either.

Sorry, say again?

Describe to me, if you are able, the argument you are putting forth.

I am not understanding your perspective with how you've presented it.

'rape jihad'

I'm going to need some statistics on that.

And I mean actual ones.

Not some CST.net website.

Again, please cite the case.

If it went to court, we can actually look at the case.

No, I am asking you to cite the case, Logan.

When you're making claims as such, it is your burden of proof.

Cite the incident, then.

There would be an incident report filed.

I'd like to see the report on it, particularly. Please tell me which case or incident it is.

Then I can find the report case through the respective office it was filed in.

That isn't terribly hard.

There are archives for this thing.

Again, what is the Report No.?

No, I am not.

I want the Report No. to find the actual written report.

And not something written via the news.

I thought you said you were a Truther?

And not someone who blatantly holds to MSM.

Yes, you can.

I know you can because I have before.

It is archival material.

'they' are as protected as any rapist.

That is, getting what they deserve.

You keep saying that

And yet all I see

Is you doing nothing.

"we are scientists"

Yikes.

if i recall properly they also don't believe in mathematics.

they think it is fake

@Holocene they have stated numerous times that math isn't reality, ignoring the fact that it is deduced from real life.

Evidently, laws of reality dictate it isn't entirely objective.

But it is about as close as you can get.

Honestly? In the last 100 years it seems to of been shrinking substantially.

There are just more people that now know it exists.

I am curious though, has anyone here, on either side "proven" their point themselves, i.e. proven the point they are stating, and not necessarily that something exists which they believes supports said point?

I do concur that even if I was to prove something, it would most likely be a practice of redundancy.

💦 t

Evidently, did you do this test yourself?

Did you do that experiment, though?

Can do *what?*

Evidently, for citations...

(Wallace, 1870)

Nor am I yours.

Mm

Wait...people think Nukes are fake?

That's, uh...

Quite impressive dissonance.

Granted, so are other things, but that in particular is very peculiar.

Evidently, you *can* have buoyancy in space or 0-G, but you need some kind of compressive force acting in the same way gravity would to force the interaction of the two entities. @Oceanic

Generally, the only way that would work is via some kind of artificial method.

Well, think of a piston, in a sense.

Or anything that acts in the same relative acceleration

No problem. It is more often than not a common thing overlooked

That buoyancy itself isn't only because of density or gravity, but also because of the chemical inter-molecular forces being incompatible for immiscible fluids.

Or even a solid and an incompatible fluid

That itself stems from the interaction of the molecules in such a capacity.

Though Pressure Gradients and their respective normal forces do have a hand

We are just looking at another level of the same question

Essentially, I was just explaining a bit further why the Pressure Gradient acts in the way it does <@!680610519224287297>

They'd probably argue that the USSR, NATO, and US were all in on the Conspiracy

For every query, you can make up *some* explanation.

Doesn't have to make much sense or have any evidence...our minds can figure out the gaps.

We're very good at protecting ourselves from realizing where we contradict ourselves, our mind at least.

Ironically, even I am religious. But I'd hope that doesn't throw me into the same pile.