Message from @rivenator12113
Discord ID: 655143552518717450
And say the whole thing was written on 1/1/100
All my points still stand.
it's literally written CE, another word for AD
*1/1/101
Yep, correct
What is your question?
At this point I’ve forgotten your original point if there ever was one
What are you trying to prove?
If it’s that the first flat earth reference is in the Zohar, then that is debunked by your own dates
*round earth
man, you can find somebody else to troll, you first referred to the talmud being created to the middle ages now you completely switch views then say ''i was right'' wtf?
I was mistaken, I was thinking of the combined Talmud and mishna
But as I said, even at the dates you provided for the Talmud, your hypothesis is disproven
What even is this conversation?
i have no idea, she said talmud now switches to something else
Yes River, would you care to state what you’re trying to prove?
i'm honestly confused
@Flat Earth PhD There's curvature in that new horizon footage. 😬
@rivenator12113 was saying that the first reference to a round earth is in the Talmud
And I was disproving that
you said that the zohar was created in the middle ages, which was false. you said the talmud was created in the middle ages, which was false.
i mean, based on what is said in the talmud itself, it wouldnt be surprising if its existence is much older than we're told. i've never read any text that encourages such deceptive behavior
The Zohar was created in the Middle Ages
What does this have to do with the earth's shape though? <:confused:625494374402228244>
@Deleted User straw manning right now? i said the zohar
Sorry, my mistake
The Zohar
Which is a middle age document
@floridaswamptrash a lot of so-called theories are just based on the philosophies of the zohar,kaballah and other mystic texts
I thought the Talmud was a middle age document, but as River rightly pointed out, it was a late antiquity document
zohar dates back to 2nd century AD
No, that’s incorrect
By your own sources that’s incorrect
And even if it were correct, it disproves your original point
i gave you 2 sources and a citation
So are you just arguing to argue?
Yes, and both agree with me
What is your question?
@Millennium Envoy Aight
''De León ascribed the work to Shimon bar Yochai ("Rashbi"), a rabbi of the 2nd century during the Roman persecution[5] ''
Mhm, did you read the next sentence?