Message from @rivenator12113

Discord ID: 655144082712297514


2019-12-13 20:25:40 UTC  

i have no idea, she said talmud now switches to something else

2019-12-13 20:25:46 UTC  

Yes River, would you care to state what you’re trying to prove?

2019-12-13 20:25:48 UTC  

i'm honestly confused

2019-12-13 20:26:08 UTC  

@Flat Earth PhD There's curvature in that new horizon footage. 😬

2019-12-13 20:26:15 UTC  

@rivenator12113 was saying that the first reference to a round earth is in the Talmud

2019-12-13 20:26:21 UTC  

And I was disproving that

2019-12-13 20:26:34 UTC  

you said that the zohar was created in the middle ages, which was false. you said the talmud was created in the middle ages, which was false.

2019-12-13 20:26:36 UTC  

i mean, based on what is said in the talmud itself, it wouldnt be surprising if its existence is much older than we're told. i've never read any text that encourages such deceptive behavior

2019-12-13 20:26:53 UTC  

The Zohar was created in the Middle Ages

2019-12-13 20:26:55 UTC  

What does this have to do with the earth's shape though? <:confused:625494374402228244>

2019-12-13 20:26:56 UTC  

@Deleted User straw manning right now? i said the zohar

2019-12-13 20:27:09 UTC  

Sorry, my mistake

2019-12-13 20:27:12 UTC  

The Zohar

2019-12-13 20:27:17 UTC  

Which is a middle age document

2019-12-13 20:27:46 UTC  

@floridaswamptrash a lot of so-called theories are just based on the philosophies of the zohar,kaballah and other mystic texts

2019-12-13 20:27:48 UTC  

I thought the Talmud was a middle age document, but as River rightly pointed out, it was a late antiquity document

2019-12-13 20:28:03 UTC  

zohar dates back to 2nd century AD

2019-12-13 20:28:10 UTC  

No, that’s incorrect

2019-12-13 20:28:17 UTC  

By your own sources that’s incorrect

2019-12-13 20:28:37 UTC  

And even if it were correct, it disproves your original point

2019-12-13 20:28:41 UTC  

i gave you 2 sources and a citation

2019-12-13 20:28:43 UTC  

So are you just arguing to argue?

2019-12-13 20:28:47 UTC  

Yes, and both agree with me

2019-12-13 20:28:51 UTC  

What is your question?

2019-12-13 20:28:53 UTC  
2019-12-13 20:29:05 UTC  

''De León ascribed the work to Shimon bar Yochai ("Rashbi"), a rabbi of the 2nd century during the Roman persecution[5] ''

2019-12-13 20:29:22 UTC  

Mhm, did you read the next sentence?

2019-12-13 20:29:31 UTC  

as·cribe
/əˈskrīb/
Learn to pronounce
verb
past tense: ascribed; past participle: ascribed
attribute something to (a cause).

2019-12-13 20:29:43 UTC  

Where they say it can’t possible have been him because it references things that happened after the Talmud?

2019-12-13 20:30:00 UTC  

If you’re going to be an asshole, you might want to have your facts straight

2019-12-13 20:30:04 UTC  

together with the circumstance that it refers to historical events of the post-Talmudical period,

2019-12-13 20:30:13 UTC  

When you read that, what does that mean to you?

2019-12-13 20:30:30 UTC  

@floridaswamptrash which makes arguing about religion pretty much pointless

2019-12-13 20:30:39 UTC  

De Leon never said he completed the Zohar, he compiled all the works that was passed down and published it

2019-12-13 20:30:57 UTC  

Yes, good work, that’s correct

2019-12-13 20:31:15 UTC  

Now did you read the entire article like a good boy?

2019-12-13 20:31:18 UTC  

Finish your homework

2019-12-13 20:31:18 UTC  

He gave the works credit to a 2nd century rabbi

2019-12-13 20:31:31 UTC  

Mhm, and what does the article say about that assertion?

2019-12-13 20:32:06 UTC  

Do you need me to answer that for you, or can you read all the letters yourself?

2019-12-13 20:32:10 UTC  

ok im positive im getting trolled lmao