And telesvopes are illuminati

Telescopes*

Kek noice

no need for sarcasm. we're just having a dialogue. I'd be a hypocrite to expect anyone to believe these things overnight

Fair

But you are not most FEs

One disputed light having physical properties

i understand your guard must be up since things can get hostile on here, given it is called "discord" heh

Now

I'm going to ask a simple question

And I hope you can answer it

Why is downwards acceleration not constant across the whole earth but constant locally?

haven't a clue.

Ok

Here's the thing about gravity as a theory, it is highly consistent with what the common person an observe in day to day life. But just cause it's consistent within our observation, doesn't mean it is the true explanation. If that makes sense. so here is my simple motto that oddly makes many people furious when i share it:

perception is dependent on reality, but reality is not dependent on perception

Ok

so basically, if something is true, it doesnt matter if we are aware of it, or how we feel

Ok

our goal is to have our perception in line with reality

with the senses we have

if i didnt have such a long history of becoming disillusioned with mainstream narratives i would probably never question gravity however

which is why i dont judge people for their conclusions

because we might not have the same knowledge

there seems to be a downward vector is all i can say

what the cause is? not sure

but in the heliocentric model "downward force" is not an accurate description

since its all relative in space

Earthwards*

If it makes you feel better

pretty much their definition yeah

lol

The problem with your argument is that it is irrefutable; you made an argument of 'I don't know and can't.'

Science doesnt prove anything

It only provides evidence

Sometimes, it is pretty strong

because that's the reality of our dilemma. when it comes to clear cut evidence regarding any theory of this downward force, we're at a stalemate. a stalemate that is deeply reliant on the shape of this landmass

i consider flat earth to be a major bonus in the "woke" department. but it isnt essential to find other big truths. i got here after a long journey

My question is that what scientific holes can a flat earth fill that a round one can't?

I’d rather go to space myself so say the earth is anything but globe

thats my point. the reason why the globe model is standing strong, is cause it is incredibly consistent with what we observe in every day life, especially if you have no suspicions