goto debate or mute

It is a shadow, measurable, testable predictable.

Wrong

shadows are not possible in that manner.

Show proof please.

Shadows don't curve unless the object is curved.

Does my table curve when I light a candle?

No.

YUP NO VISEBIL

Troll.

what

He can't debate it, can only claim its somehow not a shadow, even though we have an established light source (sol) with 2 objects that line up on the ecliptic for a measurable and predictable event

!mute @Mr. Majors Troll.

they are not lined up in the ecliptic

as i stated 10 times

<#538929818834698260>

Lol their ecliptic isnt lined up for an eclipse? You realize its called the ecliptic because that's how you have eclipses right?

Eclipse. Ecliptic plane. The plane eclipses happen on.

!mute @TheNidhugg

aw ok

i was liking the discussion

i asked many times to move to civil debate

he isnt intertested in answers or what we believe or do not believe

i think he gave an answer a few times to how it can work but you didnt accept them as accurate answers

Oh really?

I may have missed it

We were talking about refraction and infrared

He ignored that and sent a debunk video from a different observation

Never watched the video i sent

Then changed the subject to the moon

wasnt it about eclipses in the first place

He couldnt even think about what I was saying

This is flat earth chat not globe earth eclipse class

I asked a simple thing

ok

what were you saying

During some selenelion eclipses the darkening of the moon (shadow lets call it) starts from the top of the moon.

So you have the sun above one horizon and the moon above opposite horizon