Message from @Maksim

Discord ID: 675425639116963955


2020-02-07 19:36:38 UTC  

you're right

2020-02-07 19:36:47 UTC  

but i mean if we ignore morals and everything else

2020-02-07 19:36:59 UTC  

there's an objectivelly system that produces the most revenue when applied

2020-02-07 19:37:01 UTC  

At that point you're ignoring things

2020-02-07 19:37:08 UTC  

Which makes it not objective

2020-02-07 19:37:17 UTC  

Trading one thing in a circle forever

2020-02-07 19:37:22 UTC  

no, i'm not ignoring physical things, i'm ignoring objectives

2020-02-07 19:37:33 UTC  

Which is disingenuous

2020-02-07 19:37:34 UTC  

because obviously economists will also consider morals

2020-02-07 19:37:39 UTC  

not disingenuous

2020-02-07 19:37:43 UTC  

No they don't lmao

2020-02-07 19:37:49 UTC  

We can see that clearly in America

2020-02-07 19:38:05 UTC  

socialism is literally based on the idea that it's moral for the working class to hold the capital

2020-02-07 19:38:20 UTC  

I mean 'economists' will engage in morals along the lines of pushing a liberal humanism as a method of maintaining the capitalist status quo

2020-02-07 19:38:21 UTC  

"The Magic Rectangle" of Economics is pretty morally based

2020-02-07 19:39:31 UTC  

Why is high employment even good?

2020-02-07 19:39:44 UTC  

@Draško It all depends on the national goal

2020-02-07 19:39:46 UTC  

Well, depends on your goals

2020-02-07 19:40:02 UTC  

Thus a singular best economic system does not exist

2020-02-07 19:40:04 UTC  

And cannot exist

2020-02-07 19:40:21 UTC  

And it depends on a plethora of other factors

2020-02-07 19:40:23 UTC  

If you want everyone to have a decent living, then high employment is good, but that means that starting up new businesses is harder as there is less of a reserve army of labor

2020-02-07 19:40:27 UTC  

Some nations have many natural resources

2020-02-07 19:40:30 UTC  

Some don't

2020-02-07 19:40:37 UTC  

Some have good supporting geography

2020-02-07 19:40:39 UTC  

Some don't

2020-02-07 19:42:42 UTC  

Even with the same goals the same economic model cannot always be applied to other nations and work

2020-02-07 21:05:52 UTC  

@Zoltanous why would you want to china to take over

2020-02-07 21:06:00 UTC  

negative conclusion

2020-02-07 21:06:27 UTC  

Both scenarios are literal hell and are thus in effect indistinguishable

2020-02-07 21:06:55 UTC  

Both entail we lose forever and in that scenario what’s left is irrelevant

2020-02-07 21:07:01 UTC  

Yids or bugmen

2020-02-07 21:08:07 UTC  

Luckily they are vying against one another in a geopolitical power struggle that is kept away from the view of the layman

2020-02-07 22:20:01 UTC  

I would rather in a anti-Liberal global power takeover than a liberal global power at least one isn’t following fagish moralism and the free market.

2020-02-07 22:20:39 UTC  

You don’t understand what I’m getting at

2020-02-07 22:20:49 UTC  

If we lose I don’t care what happens

2020-02-07 22:21:24 UTC  

It’s irrelevant because the white race and its drive for true progress are snuffed out and replaced with stagnant gluttons who abuse and manipulate with no goal in mind other than a lavish lifestyle and inordinate power

2020-02-07 22:21:38 UTC  

While the white man survives change is still possible.

2020-02-07 22:22:04 UTC  

But the reigns can not be allowed to fall into the hands of a bug or yid affiliate or puppet

2020-02-07 22:22:28 UTC  

We’ll be right back where we started but it’ll be too late to combat miscegenation and hedonism

2020-02-07 22:23:27 UTC  

Their control of the societal mythos and it’s goals as victors of such a sizable conflict in such a scenario would be complete