Message from @Draško
Discord ID: 675424887845683205
I will beat up every analytical philosopher
Humans cannot understand objective facts so
Supply and Demand are not objective for example
Guess science doesn't real
History isn't always written by the victor
Depends on how much the victor pushes it
i'm sure that there's no objective truths being pushed in economics
@Siegfriedolin That just adds more chaos to the truth
but what is a fact is that there exists a potential best economic system
History isn't exactly neat
on what basis?
Because it would depend on what the national goal is
you're right
but i mean if we ignore morals and everything else
there's an objectivelly system that produces the most revenue when applied
At that point you're ignoring things
Which makes it not objective
Trading one thing in a circle forever
Which is disingenuous
because obviously economists will also consider morals
not disingenuous
No they don't lmao
We can see that clearly in America
socialism is literally based on the idea that it's moral for the working class to hold the capital
I mean 'economists' will engage in morals along the lines of pushing a liberal humanism as a method of maintaining the capitalist status quo
"The Magic Rectangle" of Economics is pretty morally based
Why is high employment even good?
Well, depends on your goals
Thus a singular best economic system does not exist
And cannot exist
And it depends on a plethora of other factors
If you want everyone to have a decent living, then high employment is good, but that means that starting up new businesses is harder as there is less of a reserve army of labor
Some nations have many natural resources
Some don't
Some have good supporting geography
Some don't
Even with the same goals the same economic model cannot always be applied to other nations and work