That^ should be the answer to my previous question, but which imperialism does not annoy you?

Again, depends on case

Give me an example.

Don't have any on hand, as I said - I would come to a judgement once I observe the situation

Things are pretty messed up in your mind, I've figured, but I'll let you know that all forms of Imperialism, regardless of the case, are stupid and detrimental in three levels - for the attacker, for the defender(s), and for the world in general. So you don't need to observe any case at all. Imperialism is like robbing. You could rob a house of poor people, a house of wealthy people and a bank. The house of the poor will be easier to break into, but the prize will be small, the house of the wealthy will be harder to break into, but the prize will be large, the bank is extremely hard to break into, but the prize will be extremely big. But robbing is robbing, and in all cases, no matter the situation, it is illegal and immoral. And so is Imperialism.

How is imperialism immoral?

I mean

Stealing a nation's land, for whatever reason, doesn't seem immoral to you?

Imperialism is more than just getting the wealth of a region

Well it can seem immoral but I am asking you what makes it so.

murder of mostly innocent people

also people will hate your guts for it

so?

Bruh

and it'll give incompatible people a pass to enter your country

I'm not saying I wanna kill people I just want to know why Koninos believes what he does

"I'm born in French Algeria meaning that I'm allowed to go to France"

or end up with a SA situation where your own people are getting murdered by the locals for the color of their skin

The many things that come with Imperialism:
A) The affection it has on innocent, or otherwise, humans.
B) The way it affects the other nation's economy, national integrity, and the nation's whole in general.
C) The way it mixes up populations so violently.
And more.

Ok but what makes any of that wrong?

look at Africa

The murder of humans isn't wrong?

Why do you believe it is?

Europe colonized the entire continent and shit hit the fan when they left

Why do you believe it's not?

it makes people rely on outside help to keep on living

What gives you the right to end the other's life?

think of domesticated pets and how they can't feed themselves

I never said it isn't I just want to know why you believe what you do.

Isn't it obvious? Isn't it common sense?

And why do I need a right to do something? If I am capable is that not enough justification?

Well no not really

Morality can't be tied to common sense because common sense changes

Imperialism was at one time, common sense.

So it's not obvious when you use the current common sense?

Killing in some cases is ok

Ok but what I am saying is that something being obvious doesn't necessarily attach morality to that thing

It's not obvious how killing other people, mentally hurting their society, friends, family, and causing negative feelings to another is a bad thing?

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 True.

So it may be obvious to me as a westerner that killing is wrong but in a different context it would not be

It is obviously immoral.