It is not

Not one bit

And I'm saying its just as materialistic as every other faith

I used the centre of orthodox Christianity as my example

As I used the Vatican

That is why

Orthodox ≠ Vatican

If you were judging Orthodox on that standard then you are inherently incorrect

That is not what I said

I said I used Constantinople as an example the same way I used Vatican for Catholics

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝️

- Are "Judeo-Christian values" a legitimate concept? Why or why not?

No because Jews don't legitimately exist

No

Literally minijews

Gtfo my religion lmao

^

jews have rejected Christ

Revelations 2:9

No. Jews rejected Christ.

Synagogue of satan momen funny and laughing

"Judeo-Christian" belongs to the larger class of fallacies of and through non-sectarianism, conceptually. Textually and philosophically, the Talmud and the Bible cannot reconcile. Metaphysically, they are anathema. Thus, while there is a shared tradition from OT to NT, the values of the "Jews" and the Christians are alterity.

very based

>judeo

>christian

pick one

Judaism does not exist, and hasn't existed since the birth of Christ

^

Catholics cannot be clerical fascists

Catholics are cringe until they remove the current pope

@Flash “Durr pope doesn’t agree with my political opinions”

Luther was cringe

Ok catholic

The pope prayed before a pagan idol

<:what:591451631590178846>

Luther wanted to remove parts of the Bible

He didn’t pray before a pagan idol lmfao

Literally all that happened was that he didn’t sperg about being given one

1. The apocrypha isn’t scripture

2. Yeah he did

1. The book of James is 100% scripture

2. Do you have an article for that

1. Book of James hasn’t been removed from any Protestant Bibles

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ-uKnSX_u8&list=WL&index=4&t=0s

1. Luther tried to get it removed. Also, the books Protestants declared apocryphal are mostly if not all not apocryphal. The church has the truth, cope

2. Anything less biased?