<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝️

- Are "Judeo-Christian values" a legitimate concept? Why or why not?

No because Jews don't legitimately exist

No

Literally minijews

Gtfo my religion lmao

^

jews have rejected Christ

Revelations 2:9

No. Jews rejected Christ.

Synagogue of satan momen funny and laughing

"Judeo-Christian" belongs to the larger class of fallacies of and through non-sectarianism, conceptually. Textually and philosophically, the Talmud and the Bible cannot reconcile. Metaphysically, they are anathema. Thus, while there is a shared tradition from OT to NT, the values of the "Jews" and the Christians are alterity.

very based

>judeo

>christian

pick one

Judaism does not exist, and hasn't existed since the birth of Christ

^

Catholics cannot be clerical fascists

Catholics are cringe until they remove the current pope

@Flash “Durr pope doesn’t agree with my political opinions”

Luther was cringe

Ok catholic

The pope prayed before a pagan idol

<:what:591451631590178846>

Luther wanted to remove parts of the Bible

He didn’t pray before a pagan idol lmfao

Literally all that happened was that he didn’t sperg about being given one

1. The apocrypha isn’t scripture

2. Yeah he did

1. The book of James is 100% scripture

2. Do you have an article for that

1. Book of James hasn’t been removed from any Protestant Bibles

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ-uKnSX_u8&list=WL&index=4&t=0s

1. Luther tried to get it removed. Also, the books Protestants declared apocryphal are mostly if not all not apocryphal. The church has the truth, cope

2. Anything less biased?

1. I own an apocrypha, been reading Tobit and it manages to contradict both itself and Biblical teaching

2. You got it on video what more do you need?

1. Remind me some of the books Protestants declared apocryphal

2. Context

1. (Image attached)

2. Ok what’s the context to the pope and his cardinals holding open books and reciting something in front of a pagan idol and having such obscene posters?

1. I’ll get back to you on that. What do you say about Luther wanting James to be apocryphal?

2. I don’t know. That’s what I’m asking you for

1. Do you have a source confirming that?

2. If you don't have a counter to what I've stated then the only thing that can be done is accept what I and the video state with their evidence

1. He wanted it taken out because it contradicts core Protestant beliefs. I’ll get a source after dinner.

2. You’ve linked nothing except a video from a biased source

How is the source biased?

@Flash its a notoriously-anti pope source

https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/martin-luther-james-bible

Here’s my source