There is nothing wrong with either of those

Celts acted like barbarians

Jews were, well doing what Jews do

But how does that does that clear the Byzantines of civil warring themselves into being weak

Because of material gains

Again, they weren’t warring themselves directly

It was barbarians and Jews getting pissy because they didn’t want to be a part of east rome

why is this in religion

No idea

move to <#587028275918929925> then

Because orthodox Christianity isn't materialistic

It kind of phased into this conversation

It is not

Not one bit

And I'm saying its just as materialistic as every other faith

I used the centre of orthodox Christianity as my example

As I used the Vatican

That is why

Orthodox ≠ Vatican

If you were judging Orthodox on that standard then you are inherently incorrect

That is not what I said

I said I used Constantinople as an example the same way I used Vatican for Catholics

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝️

- Are "Judeo-Christian values" a legitimate concept? Why or why not?

No because Jews don't legitimately exist

No

Literally minijews

Gtfo my religion lmao

^

jews have rejected Christ

Revelations 2:9

No. Jews rejected Christ.

Synagogue of satan momen funny and laughing

"Judeo-Christian" belongs to the larger class of fallacies of and through non-sectarianism, conceptually. Textually and philosophically, the Talmud and the Bible cannot reconcile. Metaphysically, they are anathema. Thus, while there is a shared tradition from OT to NT, the values of the "Jews" and the Christians are alterity.

very based

>judeo

>christian

pick one

Judaism does not exist, and hasn't existed since the birth of Christ

^

Catholics cannot be clerical fascists

Catholics are cringe until they remove the current pope