Obviously you did, you called it unwarranted lol

It's like calling the entire section the filioque comes from unwarranted because it was added

no, it did not came from nowhere, it came from wrong interpretations, lol

Tell me how it's wrong?

it is unwarranted because it was added

So the whole creed is unwarranted?

You've only called the word "proceeds" wrong, which doesn't effect the "and son", nor do we deny the primacy of the father

yet you do.

Not at all

We go with the fathers on this

The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. And the Son is generated from the Father

As each father said.

Cyril most clearly

The Easterns actually taught many Westerns the filioque

tbh, I feel like this is repeating for like the third time, I'd rather admit I'm wrong then continue stating what I already said and what was said during the schism, "and the son" is incorrect because it requires very proper language, which is not always used by catholics.

which is why it is a heresy

you're right, I'm wrong, I can live with this

"And the son" was used by the easterns

just please stop typing paragraphs

will return when I am more educated and can type paragraphs myself

The filioque is a very heavy concept, paragraphs just happen, sorry about that

sure

either way as of now I think it can be clearly seen where catholic church's decisions has lead

What're you going to say "woman deacons" sorry orthodox already has them.

That's even if you aren't sede of course

`What're you going to say "woman deacons" sorry orthodox already has them.
`no?

please stop trying to do a gotcha

especially before I say anything

<:wtf:591182282648190986>

I mean that's typically what orthobros bring up

I'm just preemptively saying don't claim that

uh-huh

ye

> no, I dont like him, he doesnt like me, its settled
@Sentient23 stop acting like your shit don't stink and we won't have a problem, brother.
> You've rejected Christ ***despite thinking you haven't***
@moira The fuck you smoking, child? Nah on second thought, it's irrelevant arguing with someone whom publicly couldn't tell the difference between agnostic and atheist whilst privately telling me they switch beliefs up every 3 months or so. I will say though that I find it quaint people still bag on polygamy when given our 200 year history, we stopped practising such about 140 years ago.

@Gothik Extravaganza hey i got a question for

you

*Why* is LDS the truth?

for the love of all that is good dont write a giant larp awll of text again

@moira it isn't

LDS is not Christian

I just want to know the thought process of a mormon, and why do they think LDS is true