Message from @Lettow

Discord ID: 679326187067015181


2020-02-17 22:25:57 UTC  

There is no conversation, you just described what traditionalism is, and acted like no one knew that before ya

2020-02-17 22:26:04 UTC  

but alright, i apologize for hurting your feelings

2020-02-17 22:27:34 UTC  

There was a conversation going on, I never acted the way you describe, you're the one who's actually salty for getting deported twice, but I will not give you attention no more. Consider yourself warned.

2020-02-17 22:28:19 UTC  

Not salty, i just gave an adequate response

2020-02-17 22:28:27 UTC  

lets just stop

2020-02-17 22:33:18 UTC  

@Koninos On very basic level, yes i agree, but then when you say you're a Christian traditionalist... Also imagine arguing for slavery. Slavery in antiquity and the classical period was pretty awful, so awful in fact that serfdom was a major upgrade for most of the population in Mediterranean

2020-02-17 23:26:34 UTC  

@moira serfdom is a step up from what we have now... we work more, we marry later, have less kids, spend much less time with family, it's horrible now.

2020-02-17 23:27:01 UTC  

Even in the American system slaves worked less than the free poor man.

2020-02-17 23:27:10 UTC  

Try and put yourself in perspective

2020-02-17 23:27:40 UTC  

The old law isn't binding any longer, but if you are trying to judge biblical slavery, our wage cage system is worse now

2020-02-17 23:28:11 UTC  

But if you think we are arguing pro slavery, you're not listening

2020-02-18 03:04:14 UTC  

Hope they suffer the worse

2020-02-18 07:31:49 UTC  

@Eoppa I mean, are you in the working world?

2020-02-18 07:32:07 UTC  

Because now is pretty much the best time to be a worker at any point in human history

2020-02-18 07:32:29 UTC  

We’ve had near record low unemployment, there’s new industries developing, there are more benefits than ever before

2020-02-18 07:32:40 UTC  

Also having kids later is generally a good sign

2020-02-18 07:33:02 UTC  

It means that those children are typically planned for and will typically have the support of parents with a more stable income and environment

2020-02-18 13:59:28 UTC  

Having kids at latter ages may be as a "good sign", but there is a large probability of negative biological and psycological consequences for couples bearing children at older ages. To quote a whole paragraph of M. Mills (2011):

"The detrimental individual consequences of involuntary childlessness are considerable, with individuals shown to have higher levels of clinical depression and relationship dissolution, lower levels of self-esteem, guilt and isolation (Meller et al., 2002). Older mothers also have considerably more problems during gestation and delivery, have a higher risk of birth defects and have more complications after delivery, all resulting in higher morbidity and health-care costs (Allen et al., 2006; Luke and Brown, 2007). Delay of childbearing also leads to more breast cancer. From age 20 to 25 onwards, the relative risk of breast cancer increases by 3% for every year a woman delays having her first child (Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, 2001)."

2020-02-18 13:59:31 UTC  

The paper also talks about the positive effects of having kids at older ages like better family functioning, higher family stability, more autonomous adulthood for children and a more stable economic position of parents; but the difference between the negative and positive effects, is that the negative effects don't have any solutiom due to them been inherently biological. Even *In Vitro* fertilization does not fully compensate for age loss of fecundity during the 30's onward. Meanwhile, negative effects (mostly due to social and economicall issues) may have a higher posibility of being fixed with the accomodation of social beneficts for parents (for more references on the latter subject, there is RA Moffitt, 1998 and Ja Haaga, 1998 in NCBI).

2020-02-18 13:59:44 UTC  

Sorry for the large text btw.

2020-02-18 16:02:21 UTC  

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question 🔖

**-** What is the relationship between parent and child? How should each treat the other?

2020-02-18 16:04:57 UTC  

Parents are there to guide their children and teach them right from wrong even if they have to be strict to do so; they're there to be your parents not your friend

2020-02-18 16:15:11 UTC  

Parents should be mom and dad, not policemen or teachers etc. for the child. Parents should love their children and take care of them, children should love their parents and respect their authority. Everyone should be raised in an athmosphere of love, respect and acceptance.

2020-02-18 16:33:22 UTC  

what kind of question even is this

2020-02-18 17:43:03 UTC  

@Draško a question

2020-02-18 19:36:55 UTC  

there should be mutual respect between parent and child. the parent shouldn't be able to not know what their child is doing, but being all helicopter and stalkerish isn't okay either

2020-02-18 19:37:16 UTC  

if the parent can have some sort of privacy, there should be privacy for children

2020-02-18 20:43:36 UTC  

Parent should take care of child and shape them to be good moral adults, children should respect their parents and follow their lead

2020-02-18 20:52:52 UTC  

parents are a justified hierarchy in relation to their kids 😊

2020-02-18 21:19:54 UTC  

😎 👍 💩 🔥 👺 🤑 👽 <:sad:591188782330413088>

2020-02-18 23:09:37 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/587029563863990282/679464568497635402/image0.jpg

2020-02-18 23:10:05 UTC  

the pope holds the same role muhammad has in the Quran

2020-02-18 23:10:08 UTC  

hes a heretic

2020-02-19 00:51:32 UTC  

The pope is a heretic

2020-02-19 03:02:28 UTC  

tfw

2020-02-19 03:02:31 UTC  

siege pfp

2020-02-19 03:02:38 UTC  

>pope is a heretic

2020-02-19 03:02:42 UTC  

good sentiment cringe essence

2020-02-19 03:35:30 UTC  

siege pfp

2020-02-19 03:35:41 UTC  

cant even name what pfp is