Message from @Lekka

Discord ID: 688754814766678062


2020-03-15 14:19:40 UTC  

no

2020-03-15 14:19:44 UTC  

if they're heretics they're not popes

2020-03-15 14:19:47 UTC  

that's the point

2020-03-15 14:20:29 UTC  

Isn't the selection of pope supposed to be divinely inspired?

2020-03-15 14:21:11 UTC  

the selection of **popes**
if they're heretics they aren't popes and are antipopes posing as popes

2020-03-15 14:21:18 UTC  

you're misrepresenting the position

2020-03-15 14:21:27 UTC  

you can attack the position on so many harder levels instead of this silly attempt

2020-03-15 14:22:37 UTC  

How am I misrepresenting the position? How could a heretic get into the highest seat of God's church if part of the ritual of selection is supposed to involve divine inspiration from God himself?

2020-03-15 14:22:49 UTC  

Do you not read?

2020-03-15 14:22:54 UTC  

The point is that he's not a pope

2020-03-15 14:23:09 UTC  

He's an anti pope, therefore the divine aspect of the selection of POPES does not apply to him

2020-03-15 14:24:11 UTC  

The whole concept of a "Pope" is absurd.

2020-03-15 14:24:15 UTC  

anyways

2020-03-15 14:24:26 UTC  

So then the infallibility of the pope has nothing to do with the title of pope but it's something that the people are destined for prior to their inauguration

2020-03-15 14:24:50 UTC  

No? What do you mean destined

2020-03-15 14:24:53 UTC  

Dude, this is so simple

2020-03-15 14:25:03 UTC  

If you're a heretic you're not a pope but an anti pope

2020-03-15 14:25:22 UTC  

It is simple to you but to me you're expressing paradoxical thinking and cognitive dissonance

2020-03-15 14:25:30 UTC  

if you're a heretic, we can deduce that the divine aspect of the selection does not apply, since its about selection of POPES, and if you';re an anti pope, you're not a pope

2020-03-15 14:25:41 UTC  

Stop projecting

2020-03-15 14:25:44 UTC  

nigga what

2020-03-15 14:25:59 UTC  

What's not clear

2020-03-15 14:26:20 UTC  

The infallibility of the man in the funny hat unless you find him to be heretical

2020-03-15 14:26:39 UTC  

its not about "me" finding anything, stop implying its subjective lmao

2020-03-15 14:26:51 UTC  

I don't see how this addresses anything

2020-03-15 14:26:56 UTC  

its simple, just stop misrepresenting our position

2020-03-15 14:27:31 UTC  

If the pope is capable of being a heretic or "anti pope" then clearly the man nor the title are infallible

2020-03-15 14:27:47 UTC  

You're over complicating this with abstractions to maintain infallibility

2020-03-15 14:28:05 UTC  

*If the pope is capable of being a heretic* the argument stops right here, since if they're a heretic they're not a pope

2020-03-15 14:28:13 UTC  

I'm not overcomplicating anything, its rather simple really

2020-03-15 14:28:41 UTC  

how could a heretic possibly get in the seat of the pope if the selection process is divine

2020-03-15 14:29:00 UTC  

Can you not read, please i cant repeat myself

2020-03-15 14:29:11 UTC  

If he's a heretic he's not a pope

2020-03-15 14:29:21 UTC  

If he's a heretic and not a pope, it means that that divine selection didn't apply to him

2020-03-15 14:29:23 UTC  

@Lekka if they're an anti pope then it's not divine and therefore papal infallibility is maintained because it doesn't count

2020-03-15 14:29:31 UTC  

No

2020-03-15 14:29:44 UTC  

Framing it as "it doesn't count" is disingenuous as fuck

2020-03-15 14:29:45 UTC  

So cut it out

2020-03-15 14:29:47 UTC  

yes but how could he be in the POSITION/SEAT of the pope if youre a heretic

2020-03-15 14:29:55 UTC  

HE"S NOT

2020-03-15 14:30:09 UTC  

He's not in the seat of the pope if he's a heretic thats the point