Message from @Sentient23

Discord ID: 688753306805469207


2020-03-15 02:40:50 UTC  

During the convo?

2020-03-15 02:40:53 UTC  

Lol

2020-03-15 02:41:32 UTC  

yes literally got asked to verify phone which i cant

2020-03-15 02:53:49 UTC  

F

2020-03-15 02:55:28 UTC  

F

2020-03-15 03:05:36 UTC  

@ComradeChaos yee i know dat

2020-03-15 03:05:41 UTC  

<:spooki:622667080457781260>

2020-03-15 03:32:01 UTC  

>>this sounds like the some hermetic stuff, can you confirm
Like I've tried to tell eoppa, hermetic philosophy influenced Catholicism quite heavily, so much so that they call their study of scripture hermeneutics
@Tekka

2020-03-15 03:32:06 UTC  

> Jesus was a son of god but not the only one
The absolute state of shirk

2020-03-15 03:32:28 UTC  

The Vatican does not approve

2020-03-15 03:32:40 UTC  

Who cares

2020-03-15 03:33:33 UTC  

The Catholics don't even believe in papal infallibility if they believe the Vatican seat is"vacant"

2020-03-15 03:38:14 UTC  

Wrong

2020-03-15 03:38:41 UTC  

Didnt i already debunk you on this? I think i did, and then u ran away without addressing my points

2020-03-15 03:39:33 UTC  

When i specifically told u not to lecture me about my philosophy since u evidently dont know anything about sedevacantism

2020-03-15 08:35:47 UTC  

@Eoppa is that the Aristotelian proof?

2020-03-15 13:52:09 UTC  

Yes

2020-03-15 14:18:35 UTC  

@Sentient23
You confirmed that a pope can nullify the infallibility of the popes that come after him because of the infallibility he was given that allows him to declare they are illegitimate

2020-03-15 14:19:09 UTC  

In effect, nullifying papal infallibility

2020-03-15 14:19:40 UTC  

no

2020-03-15 14:19:44 UTC  

if they're heretics they're not popes

2020-03-15 14:19:47 UTC  

that's the point

2020-03-15 14:20:29 UTC  

Isn't the selection of pope supposed to be divinely inspired?

2020-03-15 14:21:11 UTC  

the selection of **popes**
if they're heretics they aren't popes and are antipopes posing as popes

2020-03-15 14:21:18 UTC  

you're misrepresenting the position

2020-03-15 14:21:27 UTC  

you can attack the position on so many harder levels instead of this silly attempt

2020-03-15 14:22:37 UTC  

How am I misrepresenting the position? How could a heretic get into the highest seat of God's church if part of the ritual of selection is supposed to involve divine inspiration from God himself?

2020-03-15 14:22:49 UTC  

Do you not read?

2020-03-15 14:22:54 UTC  

The point is that he's not a pope

2020-03-15 14:23:09 UTC  

He's an anti pope, therefore the divine aspect of the selection of POPES does not apply to him

2020-03-15 14:24:11 UTC  

The whole concept of a "Pope" is absurd.

2020-03-15 14:24:15 UTC  

anyways

2020-03-15 14:24:26 UTC  

So then the infallibility of the pope has nothing to do with the title of pope but it's something that the people are destined for prior to their inauguration

2020-03-15 14:24:50 UTC  

No? What do you mean destined

2020-03-15 14:24:53 UTC  

Dude, this is so simple

2020-03-15 14:25:03 UTC  

If you're a heretic you're not a pope but an anti pope

2020-03-15 14:25:22 UTC  

It is simple to you but to me you're expressing paradoxical thinking and cognitive dissonance

2020-03-15 14:25:30 UTC  

if you're a heretic, we can deduce that the divine aspect of the selection does not apply, since its about selection of POPES, and if you';re an anti pope, you're not a pope

2020-03-15 14:25:41 UTC  

Stop projecting

2020-03-15 14:25:44 UTC  

nigga what

2020-03-15 14:25:59 UTC  

What's not clear