Message from @Sentient23
Discord ID: 688753737442787356
@ComradeChaos yee i know dat
<:spooki:622667080457781260>
>>this sounds like the some hermetic stuff, can you confirm
Like I've tried to tell eoppa, hermetic philosophy influenced Catholicism quite heavily, so much so that they call their study of scripture hermeneutics
@Tekka
> Jesus was a son of god but not the only one
The absolute state of shirk
The Vatican does not approve
Who cares
The Catholics don't even believe in papal infallibility if they believe the Vatican seat is"vacant"
Wrong
Didnt i already debunk you on this? I think i did, and then u ran away without addressing my points
When i specifically told u not to lecture me about my philosophy since u evidently dont know anything about sedevacantism
@Eoppa is that the Aristotelian proof?
Yes
@Sentient23
You confirmed that a pope can nullify the infallibility of the popes that come after him because of the infallibility he was given that allows him to declare they are illegitimate
In effect, nullifying papal infallibility
no
if they're heretics they're not popes
that's the point
Isn't the selection of pope supposed to be divinely inspired?
the selection of **popes**
if they're heretics they aren't popes and are antipopes posing as popes
you're misrepresenting the position
How am I misrepresenting the position? How could a heretic get into the highest seat of God's church if part of the ritual of selection is supposed to involve divine inspiration from God himself?
Do you not read?
The point is that he's not a pope
He's an anti pope, therefore the divine aspect of the selection of POPES does not apply to him
The whole concept of a "Pope" is absurd.
anyways
So then the infallibility of the pope has nothing to do with the title of pope but it's something that the people are destined for prior to their inauguration
No? What do you mean destined
Dude, this is so simple
If you're a heretic you're not a pope but an anti pope
It is simple to you but to me you're expressing paradoxical thinking and cognitive dissonance
if you're a heretic, we can deduce that the divine aspect of the selection does not apply, since its about selection of POPES, and if you';re an anti pope, you're not a pope
Stop projecting
nigga what
What's not clear
The infallibility of the man in the funny hat unless you find him to be heretical
its not about "me" finding anything, stop implying its subjective lmao
I don't see how this addresses anything
its simple, just stop misrepresenting our position
If the pope is capable of being a heretic or "anti pope" then clearly the man nor the title are infallible