Message from @annapalms
Discord ID: 658678345462054929
i imagine that the homos that do want to have children are likely more similar to hetero couples
less promiscuity etc
so that finding makes sense ig
only thing ive ever found on it was this
but it was controversial
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313882
@Spergerger men naturally want to have kids
Can confirm
Yes.
Desiring children varies person to person
People generally tend to lean in favor of, as a result of biological urges and social pressures, but it's not a blanket statement
Also, parent quality likewise varies person to person - Some lesbian mothers might be amazing at raising a kiddo, some straight couple might be terrible at it
What do you think he meant by naturally
Or the inverse could be true
"men naturally want to have kids" seems like too much of a blanket statement
Yeah heres what i understand
Piss Pee pee poo poo caca
And a little bit of titi
Thanks for the insight fellow monke
I mean probably only 10% of the app is active
The 90% of that 10% are libtards
@Ater Votum the analysts recognize this in the study itself actually and grant that there are definitely potential issues in collecting data using small sample sizes. But there are upsides as well; as the review points out "smaller sample sizes in qualitative or observational data, as well as targeted surveys provide an in-depth assessment of specific family experiences that are unavailable in large-scale surveys."
Sorry I'm getting back to you on this so late, I'm a wagie
@adolphus the sorrowful What field of work are you in that designates you a “wagie.”
I work a little around 40 hours a week between a fast food joint and a warehouse
I get today off though cause the holidays 🙂
Do you need me to prescribe you happy pills.
To make the pain go away.
yes
@adolphus the sorrowful You are literally refusing acknowledge studies that support the traditional view — whether in their professional papers or in their court briefs. Ignoring counter-evidence is unorthodox in the hard sciences, but social science is heavily politicized, and the practice — especially in studies about homosexuality — is lamentably prevalent. While traditional notions are generally reinforced by punctilious examination of even the pro-gay literature, i will examine the findings from the 2012 Regnerus study.
Of all the studies of homosexual parents to date, Regnerus addressed the broadest array of variables and represents the most sizably voluminous arbitrary sample study of how adults turn out when they have (or had) a homosexual parent. 2,988 individuals aged 18-39 were culled from a probability-predicated pool of approximately 15,000 potential subjects in order to find an adequate number of adult children of homosexuals and a commensurable number of adults with a homogeneous demographic profile who were raised in other circumstances.
Regnerus’ findings support traditional notions that children do best in an espoused household, and that even sub-optimal heterosexual rearing — such as single parenthood or being raised with stepparents — is better than being raised by a homosexual.
Weighted to match population parameters, Regnerus estimated that 1.7% of the nation’s children have one or more homosexual parents. By comparison, Cameron and Cameron’s desultory survey of 5,182 adults in 1983-84 yielded unweighted estimates of 1.6% and 1.7%. Such close acquiescent between two nationwide studies predicated on arbitrary samples reinforces the credibility of both investigations. In Table 1, each of the 40 outcome measures that Regnerus studied and reported is ranked by kind of family unit. The family type that scored best on each variable is ranked #1, second-best #2 and so on, with the worst ranked #8. Family types that were tied on any outcome were assigned a prevalent ‘midrank,’ a standard statistical rank average.
Most of Table 1 fits right in line with traditional credences. For instance, those with gay or lesbian parent(s) were the:
most apt to say they were not exclusively heterosexual,
most apt to be on welfare,
least apt to be employed,
most apt to have gotten a sexually transmitted infection,
most apt to have recently thought of suicide,
most apt to report rape,
most apt to test impulsive,
most apt to smoke,
most apt to report heftily ponderous TV viewing,
most apt to have been apprehended,
most apt to have pled guilty to a crime,
most apt to score high on depression,
least apt to report being able to depend on others,
least apt to report having felt secure and safe in their family, and
most promiscuous.
There has been systematic effort by Hollywood and academia — including the professional societies — to ‘clean up’ the image of homosexuality for some time. Hollywood, especially, seems to tout the importance of ‘love’ above all (except, of course, when it comes to keeping actors and actresses married).
What's the sample size?
Ideological subversion moment
And the standard error
Destroying the cultural and political foundations of America
I don't trust statistical studies ngl


